pronuclear microinjection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

52
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1969
Author(s):  
Alexander Smirnov ◽  
Nariman Battulin

Generation of transgenic organisms by pronuclear microinjection has become a routine procedure. However, while the process of DNA integration in the genome is well understood, we still do not know much about the recombination between transgene molecules that happens in the first moments after DNA injection. Most of the time, injected molecules are joined together in head-to-tail tandem repeats—the so-called concatemers. In this review, we focused on the possible concatenation mechanisms and how they could be studied with genetic reporters tracking individual copies in concatemers. We also discuss various features of concatemers, including palindromic junctions and repeat-induced gene silencing (RIGS). Finally, we speculate how cooperation of DNA repair pathways creates a multicopy concatenated insert.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason C. Lin ◽  
Alison L. Van Eenennaam

The introduction of genome editing reagents into mammalian zygotes has traditionally been accomplished by cytoplasmic or pronuclear microinjection. This time-consuming procedure requires expensive equipment and a high level of skill. Electroporation of zygotes offers a simplified and more streamlined approach to transfect mammalian zygotes. There are a number of studies examining the parameters used in electroporation of mouse and rat zygotes. Here, we review the electroporation conditions, timing, and success rates that have been reported for mice and rats, in addition to the few reports about livestock zygotes, specifically pigs and cattle. The introduction of editing reagents at, or soon after, fertilization can help reduce the rate of mosaicism, the presence of two of more genotypes in the cells of an individual; as can the introduction of nuclease proteins rather than mRNA encoding nucleases. Mosaicism is particularly problematic in large livestock species with long generation intervals as it can take years to obtain non-mosaic, homozygous offspring through breeding. Gene knockouts accomplished via the non-homologous end joining pathway have been more widely reported and successfully accomplished using electroporation than have gene knock-ins. Delivering large DNA plasmids into the zygote is hindered by the zona pellucida (ZP), and the majority of gene knock-ins accomplished by electroporation have been using short single stranded DNA (ssDNA) repair templates, typically less than 1 kb. The most promising approach to deliver larger donor repair templates of up to 4.9 kb along with genome editing reagents into zygotes, without using cytoplasmic injection, is to use recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAVs) in combination with electroporation. However, similar to other methods used to deliver clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat (CRISPR) genome-editing reagents, this approach is also associated with high levels of mosaicism. Recent developments complementing germline ablated individuals with edited germline-competent cells offer an approach to avoid mosaicism in the germline of genome edited founder lines. Even with electroporation-mediated delivery of genome editing reagents to mammalian zygotes, there remain additional chokepoints in the genome editing pipeline that currently hinder the scalable production of non-mosaic genome edited livestock.


Cell Reports ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 107653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaya Abe ◽  
Ken-ichi Inoue ◽  
Yasuhide Furuta ◽  
Hiroshi Kiyonari

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Gavin ◽  
S. Blash ◽  
N. Buzzell ◽  
D. Pollock ◽  
L. Chen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Kai Chuang ◽  
Chien-Hong Chen ◽  
Chung-Ling Huang ◽  
Yu-Hsiu Su ◽  
Shu-Hui Peng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document