Comparison of 1.0 g/kg of 20% mannitol initiated at different time points and effects on brain relaxation in patients with midline shift undergoing supratentorial tumor resection: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE Previous studies have suggested the use of 1.0 g/kg of 20% mannitol at the time of skin incision during neurosurgery in order to improve brain relaxation. However, the incidence of brain swelling upon dural opening is still high with this dose. In the present study, the authors sought to determine a better timing for mannitol infusion. METHODS One hundred patients with midline shift who were undergoing elective supratentorial tumor resection were randomly assigned to receive early (immediately after anesthesia induction) or routine (at the time of skin incision) administration of 1.0 g/kg body weight of 20% mannitol. The primary outcome was the 4-point brain relaxation score (BRS) immediately after dural opening (1, perfectly relaxed; 2, satisfactorily relaxed; 3, firm brain; and 4, bulging brain). The secondary outcomes included subdural intracranial pressure (ICP) measured immediately before dural opening; serum osmolality and osmole gap (OG) measured immediately before mannitol infusion (T0) and at the time of dural opening (TD); changes in serum electrolytes, lactate, and hemodynamic parameters at T0 and 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes thereafter; and fluid balance at TD. RESULTS The time from the start of mannitol administration to dural opening was significantly longer in the early administration group than in the routine administration group (median 66 [IQR 55–75] vs 40 [IQR 38–45] minutes, p < 0.001). The BRS (score 1/2/3/4, n = 14/26/9/1 vs 3/25/18/4, p = 0.001) was better and the subdural ICP (median 5 [IQR 3–6] vs 7 [IQR 5–10] mm Hg, p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the early administration group than in the routine administration group. Serum osmolality and OG increased significantly at TD compared to levels at T0 in both groups (all p < 0.001). Intergroup comparison showed that serum osmolality and OG at TD were significantly higher in the routine administration group (p < 0.001 and = 0.002, respectively). Patients who had received early administration of mannitol had more urine output (p = 0.001) and less positive fluid balance (p < 0.001) at TD. Hemodynamic parameters, serum lactate concentrations, and incidences of electrolyte disturbances were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Prolonging the time interval between the start of mannitol infusion and dural incision from approximately 40 to 66 minutes can improve brain relaxation and decrease subdural ICP in elective supratentorial tumor resection.

Elective versus nonelective brain tumor resections: a 5-year propensity score matching cost comparison analysis

OBJECTIVE Elective surgical cases generally have lower costs, higher profit margins, and better outcomes than nonelective cases. Investigating the differences in cost and profit between elective and nonelective cases would help hospitals in planning strategies to withstand financial losses due to potential pandemics. The authors sought to evaluate the exact cost and profit margin differences between elective and nonelective supratentorial tumor resections at a single institution. METHODS The authors collected economic analysis data in all patients who underwent supratentorial tumor resection at their institution between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were grouped into elective and nonelective cases. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for heterogeneity of baseline characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS There were 143 elective cases and 232 nonelective cases over the 5 years. Patients in the majority of elective cases had private insurance and in the majority of nonelective cases the patients had Medicare/Medicaid (p < 0.01). The total charges were significantly lower for elective cases ($168,800.12) compared to nonelective cases ($254,839.30, p < 0.01). The profit margins were almost 6 times higher for elective than for nonelective cases ($13,025.28 vs $2,128.01, p = 0.04). After propensity score matching, there was still a significant difference between total charges and total cost. CONCLUSIONS Elective supratentorial tumor resections were associated with significantly lower costs with shorter lengths of stay while also being roughly 6 times more profitable than nonelective cases. These findings may help future planning for hospital strategies to survive financial losses during future pandemics that require widespread cancellation of elective cases.