Characteristics of Patients With Complex Limb Pain Evaluated Through an Interdisciplinary Approach Utilizing Magnetic Resonance Neurography

Patients with persistent complex limb pain represent a substantial diagnostic challenge. Physical exam, and tests such as nerve conduction, are often normal even though the patient suffers from severe pain. In 2015, we initiated a team-based approach to evaluate such patients. The approach included physicians from several specialties (Anesthesiology/Pain Medicine, Radiology, Plastic Surgery, Neurosurgery) combined with the use of advanced imaging with Magnetic Resonance Neurography (MRN). This preliminary case series discusses MRN findings identified in patients with previously difficult-to-diagnose peripheral limb pain and describes how this combination of approaches influenced our diagnosis and treatment plans. We extracted demographics, patient characteristics, presenting features, diagnostic tests performed, treatments provided, referral diagnosis and the diagnosis after interdisciplinary team evaluation from patient charts. We evaluated MRN and electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) ability to identify injured nerves. We compared abnormal findings from these diagnostics to patient reported outcome after ultrasound-guided nerve block. A total of 58 patients, 17 males and 41 females, were identified. The majority of patients presented with lower extremity pain (75%) and had prior surgery (43%). The most commonly identified abnormality on MRN was nerve signal alteration on fluid sensitive sequences, followed by caliber change and impingement. Comparing the outcome of diagnostic nerve blocks with abnormal nerve findings on MRN or EDX, we found that MRN had a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 100% while for EDX it was 45 and 0%, respectively. After interdisciplinary discussion and imaging review, a more specific diagnosis was produced in 78% of evaluated cases opening up additional treatment pathways such as nerve-targeted surgery, which was performed in 36% cases. This descriptive case series demonstrates that a majority of patients evaluated by our team for complex limb pain were women with lower extremity pain resulting from surgery. In addition, an interdisciplinary team evaluation and the use of the moderately sensitive but highly specific MRN imaging modality resulted in a change in diagnosis for a majority of patients with complex limb pain. Future studies investigating patient outcomes after diagnosis change are currently underway based on the findings of this preliminary study.

Efficacy of epidural injection of steroid in treatment of lumber disc prolapse: article review

"Chronic low back and lower extremity pain is mainly caused by lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and radiculitis. Various surgery and nonsurgical modalities, including epidural injections, have been used to treat LDH or radiculitis. Caudal epidural injection of local anesthetics with or without steroids is one of the most commonly used interventions in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain. To describe the indications, rationale, techniques, alternatives, contraindications, complications, and efficacy of lumbar and caudal epidural corticosteroid injections. Interventions: Three reviewers with formal training and certification in evidence-based medicine searched the literature on non–image guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections. A larger team of seven reviewers independently assessed the methodology of studies found and appraised the quality of the evidence presented. A systematic literature search was performed, in the Medline Case reports and retrospective and prospective studies were extensively reviewed to provide detailed descriptions of the clinical features of lumbar and caudal epidural corticosteroid injections. Data sources included relevant literature of the English language identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE , and manual searches of bibliographies of known primary and review articles. Epidural corticosteroid injections are commonly requested treatments for patients with various low-back or lower-extremity pain syndromes (or both). Most of the reports on the use of this type of treatment are retrospective and noncontrolled. These studies indicate benefit; however, the prospective controlled studies provide varied results about the efficacy of lumbar and caudal epidural corticosteroid injections. In conclusions: In patients with lumbar radicular pain secondary to disc herniation or neurogenic claudication due to spinal stenosis, interlaminar epidural steroid injections appear to have clinical effectiveness limited to short-term pain relief. Therefore, in a contemporary medical practice, these procedures should be restricted to the rare settings where fluoroscopy is not available."

Successful Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain With Lower Than Usual Placement of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient With Uncorrected Tethered Cord: Case Report

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) often leads to severe back and leg pain. The typical treatment to stall disease progression is untethering surgery, but this is not always effective for pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an efficacious treatment for neuropathic pain. However, it has seldom been utilized in TCS cases. Moreover, with cord elongation, ideal paddle placement is not certain. CLINICAL PRESENTATION We present the case of a 77-yr-old male with severe chronic lower-back and lower-extremity pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed severe lumbar spine degenerative changes, along with a previously undiagnosed spina bifida and conus medullaris termination at L5. We felt that SCS would be the best treatment avenue for his chief complaint of pain. Due to cord elongation, we trialed lower placement of the high-frequency (HF)-SCS system at T11-T12, which led to 80% improvement in pain symptoms within 1 wk and ability to walk for the first time in a year. At his first follow-up appointment, the patient endorsed 80% to 90% relief of his lower-back and bilateral lower-extremity pain, which improved to 100% relief at 12 mo at last visit. CONCLUSION Only 4 other reports were identified in the literature utilizing SCS in TCS cases. Our case adds to the limited body of literature that SCS is an effective therapy for pain in TCS and degenerative spine disease. Only 2 other reports employed lower than usual lead placement. Our case demonstrates that lead placement may need to be changed to accommodate the elongated cord.