beach morphodynamics
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

62
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 112809
Author(s):  
Elisabete Tsukada ◽  
Ermínio Fernandes ◽  
Cristiane Vidal ◽  
Raquel Fernanda Salla

Author(s):  
Alexandros Petropoulos ◽  
Niki Evelpidou ◽  
Vasilis Kapsimalis ◽  
Christos Anagnostou ◽  
Anna Karkani

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 272
Author(s):  
Cyprien Bosserelle ◽  
Shari L. Gallop ◽  
Ivan D. Haigh ◽  
Charitha B. Pattiaratchi

Natural formations of rock and coral can support geologically controlled beaches, where the beach dynamics are significantly influenced by these structures. However, little is known about how alongshore variations in geological controls influence beach morphodynamics. Therefore, in this study we focus on the storm response of a beach (Yanchep in south Western Australia) that has strong alongshore variation in the level of geological control because of the heterogeneous calcarenite limestone reef. We used a modified version of XBeach to simulate the beach morphodynamics during a significant winter storm event. We find that the longshore variation in topography of the reef resulted in: (1) strong spatial difference in current distribution, including areas with strong currents jets; and (2) significant alongshore differences in sand flux, with larger fluxes in areas strongly geologically controlled by reefs. In particular, this resulted in enhanced beach erosion at the boundary of the reef where strong currents jet-exited the nearshore.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Katerina Kombiadou ◽  
Susana Costas ◽  
Dano Roelvink

Short-term beach morphodynamics are typically modelled solely through storm-induced erosion, disregarding post-storm recovery. Yet, the full cycle of beach profile response is critical to simulating and understanding morphodynamics over longer temporal scales. The XBeach model is calibrated using topographic profiles from a reflective beach (Faro Beach, in S. Portugal) during and after the incidence of a fierce storm (Emma) that impacted the area in early 2018. Recovery in all three profiles showed rapid steepening of the beachface and significant recovery of eroded volumes (68–92%) within 45 days after the storm, while berm heights reached 4.5–5 m. Two calibration parameters were used (facua and bermslope), considering two sets of values, one for erosive (Hm0 ≥ 3 m) and one for accretive (Hm0 < 3 m) conditions. A correction of the runup height underestimation by the model in surfbeat mode was necessary to reproduce the measured berm elevation and morphology during recovery. Simulated profiles effectively capture storm erosion, but also berm growth and gradual recovery of the profiles, showing good skill in all three profiles and recovery phases. These experiments will be the basis to formulate event-scale simulations using schematized wave forcing that will allow to calibrate the model for longer-term changes.


2020 ◽  
pp. 461-486
Author(s):  
Nadia Senechal ◽  
Amaia Ruiz de Alegría-Arzaburu
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document