transhiatal approach
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

53
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Videoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Kumaira Fonseca ◽  
Júlia Iaroseski ◽  
João Vicente Machado Grossi ◽  
Guilherme Gonçalves Pretto ◽  
Marcos Mucenic ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
László Andrási ◽  
Zoltán Szepes ◽  
László Tiszlavicz ◽  
György Lázár ◽  
Attila Paszt

Abstract Background Leiomyoma is the most common benign oesophageal tumour. Half of all leiomyoma patients have oesophagus-associated complaints, such as dysphagia and epigastric pain, and the other 50% are asymptomatic with a diagnosis made on incidental discovery. Endoscopic ultrasonography is essential for an accurate preoperative workup and can enable guided-tissue acquisition for immunohistochemistry in certain cases. Smaller tumours are amenable to traditional and novel endoscopic removal in specialized centres, but some complex cases require surgical enucleation with a minimally invasive approach. Case presentation An asymptomatic 60-year-old woman was accidentally diagnosed with a bifocal oesophageal mass, which was discovered by chest computed tomography. We report a rare case of a duplicated lower-third oesophageal leiomyoma, which was completely removed via the laparoscopic transhiatal approach. The patient has recovered successfully from the surgery. She has been followed up for six months with a normal oesophagram, adequate oesophageal function and no complaints observed. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of leiomyoma in both lesions. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of duplex oesophageal leiomyomas removed laparoscopically. Using the minimally invasive abdominal technique, the lower oesophagus can be mobilised to the mediastinum without pleura injury and offers a good alternative to the thoracoscopic approach in patients with possible intrathoracic difficulties. At experienced centres, laparoscopic transhiatal enucleation of lower oesophageal leiomyomas and other benign tumours with a combination of intraoperative oesophagoscopy is a safe, fast and effective operation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Wai-yan Chiu ◽  
Eline Marieke de Groot ◽  
Hon-chi Yip ◽  
Jan-Hendrik Egberts ◽  
Peter Grimminger ◽  
...  

Summary Pulmonary complications, and especially pneumonia, remain one of the most common complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. These complications are reduced by minimally invasive techniques or by avoiding thoracic access through a transhiatal approach. However, a transhiatal approach does not allow for a full mediastinal lymphadenectomy. A transcervical mediastinal esophagectomy avoids thoracic access, which may contribute to a decrease in pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. In addition, this technique allows for a full mediastinal lymphadenectomy. A number of pioneering studies have been published on this topic. Here, the initial experience is presented as well as a review of the current literature concerning transcervical esophagectomy, with a focus on the robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy procedure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-135
Author(s):  
Alexios Dosis ◽  
Patrick Casey ◽  
Paul Turner ◽  
Vinutha Shetty ◽  
Jeremy Ward ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 155-155
Author(s):  
Masanori Tokunaga ◽  
Eigo Akimoto ◽  
Reo Sato ◽  
Akio Kaito ◽  
Takahiro Kinoshita

155 Background: Optimal surgical approach for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG-II) has not yet been determined, presumably due to complex anatomical structures and the limited number of reports regarding this aspect. The transhiatal approach is preferred in East Asia in cases with 30 mm or less esophageal invasion, and laparoscopic surgery is increasingly performed. However, the feasibility of the laparoscopic transhiatal approach for AEG-II is still unclear, and thus was investigated in this study. Methods: A total of 51 consecutive patients who underwent total/proximal gastrectomy with lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy by laparoscopic transhiatal approach between January 2008 and May 2018 were included. Patients with greater than 30 mm esophageal invasion, and those who received preoperative chemotherapy, were excluded. Results: The male/female ratio was 38:13, and the median age (range) was 69 (37-81) years. Total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy were performed in 10 and 41 patients, respectively. All surgeries were performed by experienced surgical teams. Median operation time and intra-operative blood loss were 300 (141-511) minutes and 21 (0-267) g, respectively. Pathological tumor depth was T2 or deeper in 28 patients (55%), and nodal status was negative in 20 patients (39%). Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher complications were observed in eight patients (16%), which included two anastomotic leakages and one pancreas fistula, and the mortality rate was 0%. The 5-year overall survival rate of all patients was 97% with a median observational period of 30 months. Conclusions: Laparoscopic transhiatal approach with lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy seems to be a technically feasible procedure, provided an experienced surgical team performs the surgeries. However, oncological safety for advanced disease needs to be confirmed, considering that the proportion of advanced stage cancer included in this study was limited.


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (07) ◽  
pp. 606-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukinori Yamagata ◽  
Kazuyuki Saito ◽  
Kosuke Hirano ◽  
Masatoshi Oya

AbstractIn esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer, chylothorax may develop at a certain frequency. For chylothorax, conservative treatment is selected first, but if it is not improved, thoracic duct (TD) ligation is considered. In general, transthoracic approach is chosen to reach the TD. However, it is sometimes difficult to identify the TD due to adhesion in the thoracic cavity. Hence, we selected a laparoscopic transhiatal approach to the TD. We introduce the procedure of our laparoscopic transhiatal TD ligation technique.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoontaek Lee ◽  
Sa-Hong Min ◽  
Ki Bum Park ◽  
Young Suk Park ◽  
Sang-Hoon Ahn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document