course delivery format
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
pp. 105477382095812
Author(s):  
Loralee Sessanna ◽  
Patricia Nisbet ◽  
Nouf Alanazi ◽  
Deborah Lorissaint ◽  
Samantha L. Auerbach ◽  
...  

Adult women with multiple sclerosis (MS) can benefit from innovative mindfulness-based interventions designed and structured with understanding and consideration of the multifaceted challenges these women face on a daily basis. The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore the experience of participating in an online or traditional onsite 8-week, once a week, Mind Body Stress Reduction combined with Sleep Retraining course among women living with MS to establish online course acceptability. Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis method was used to analyze focus group interview data. Time and length for both courses was found acceptable, camaraderie and interconnectedness were essential, having choice regarding course delivery format was important, and being provided with organized learning materials at the course start in a binder or packet was considered imperative. Acceptability was established for both the online and onsite formats.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Rogers ◽  
Anna M Smith ◽  
Yeajin Ham ◽  
Jae‐eun M Russell

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 58-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blake Colclasure ◽  
Sarah LaRose ◽  
Anna Warner ◽  
Taylor Ruth ◽  
J. C. Bunch ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Blau ◽  
Sherry Jarrell ◽  
Anthony Seeton ◽  
Tim Young ◽  
Kelly Grace ◽  
...  

Online education continues to increase. With increased online offerings, it is important to evaluate the integrity or equivalence of online/hybrid courses relative to face-to-face (F2F) courses. This study used three separate samples of business undergraduates taking both online/hybrid and F2F courses in the same semester (i.e., mixed course delivery format), across summer, fall and spring semesters. Eight items were used to assess students’ perceived favorability of online courses (PFoOC) compared to F2F courses. Across all three samples, two related but distinct sources for course comparison consistently emerged, instructor-related and peer related. An eight-item measure represents a necessary improvement over a previously developed four-item PFoOC measure, because it allows for additional relevant item comparisons between online/hybrid versus F2F courses. It is hoped that this measure can be used to further research evaluating online education. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 112-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie L. Hahs-Vaughn ◽  
Hannah Acquaye ◽  
Matthew D. Griffith ◽  
Hang Jo ◽  
Ken Matthews ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document