facility age
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. ar.2016.7.0170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph T. Ellenburg ◽  
Jay A. Lieberman ◽  
Debendra Pattanaik

Background Although allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is effective and safe, nonadherence is common. Limited data exist regarding adherence to ATT, factors that affect adherence, and systemic reactions associated with ATT among veteran populations. Objective To evaluate adherence to AIT and the prevalence of reactions secondary to AIT among patients at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of veterans who received AIT at a single Veterans Affairs facility. Age, race, sex, the total number of shots, travel distance, a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and the number of severe adverse reactions were compared between the veterans who were adherent and veterans who were nonadherent. Results The overall adherence rate was 60.9%. Factors associated with adherence were a chart diagnosis of PTSD (293% [adherent group] versus 13.6% [nonadherent group]; p = 0.03) and home residence being a further distance from the facility (21.9 miles / 35.2 kilometers [adherent group] versus 18.0 miles/28.9 kilometers [nonadherentgroup]; p = 0.03). Patients who were adherent received an average of more total injections compared with patients who were nonadherent. Age, sex, race, and history of systemic reactions during AIT displayed no statistically significant differences between the groups. There were a total of 20 systemic reactions, and the systemic reaction rate was 0.2% per AIT encounter and 0.1% per injection. Conclusion AIT adherence and systemic reaction rates among veterans at our facility was comparable with similar studies. Adherence was associated with a chart diagnosis of PTSD and home residence that was further away from the clinic.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis F. Riquelme

The clinical swallow examination (CSE) is widely used by clinicians evaluating patients with dysphagia, yet this method remains controversial among many. The composition and purpose of the CSE are highly variable by region, facility, age group and individual clinician. This article will review literature on the topic and present clinical practice suggestions to further its usefulness and ongoing investigation.


2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad D. McEvoy ◽  
Mark S. Nagel ◽  
Timothy D. DeSchriver ◽  
Matthew T. Brown

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document