turbulent premixed
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1164
(FIVE YEARS 203)

H-INDEX

63
(FIVE YEARS 8)

2022 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. 111943
Author(s):  
Qingshuang Fan ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
Leilei Xu ◽  
Arman Ahamed Subash ◽  
Christian Brackmann ◽  
...  

Fuel ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 310 ◽  
pp. 122292
Author(s):  
Wu Jin ◽  
Chaoqun Ren ◽  
Jianzhong Li ◽  
Jinhua Wang ◽  
Yisheng Yan

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhanalakshmi Sellan ◽  
Saravanan Balusamy

2022 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 107253
Author(s):  
Dhanalakshmi Sellan ◽  
Saravanan Balusamy
Keyword(s):  

Fluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 462
Author(s):  
Halit Kutkan ◽  
Joel Guerrero

Hereafter, we used the Algebraic Flame Surface Wrinkling (AFSW) model to conduct numerical simulations of the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) high-pressure, turbulent premixed Bunsen flame experiments. We implemented the AFSW model in OpenFOAM and in Ansys Fluent, and we compared the outcome of both solvers against the experimental results. We also highlight the differences between both solvers. All the simulations were performed using a two-dimensional axisymmetric model with the standard k−ϵ turbulence model with wall functions. Two different fuel/air mixtures were studied, namely, a 100%CH4 volumetric ratio and a 60%CH4+ 40%H2 volumetric ratio. The thermophysical and transport properties of the mixture were calculated as a function of temperature using the library Cantera (open-source suite of tools for problems involving chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes), together with the GRI-Mech 3.0 chemical mechanism. It was found that the outcome of the AFSW model implemented in both solvers was in good agreement with the experimental results, quantitatively and qualitatively speaking. Further assessment of the results showed that, as much as the chemistry, the turbulence model and turbulent boundary/initial conditions significantly impact the flame shape and height.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document