eucalypt forest
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

380
(FIVE YEARS 36)

H-INDEX

44
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
B. K. V. Yadav ◽  
A. Lucieer ◽  
G. J. Jordan ◽  
S. C. Baker

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Barker ◽  
Owen F. Price ◽  
Meaghan E. Jenkins

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (20) ◽  
pp. 7952-7977
Author(s):  
Bechu K.V. Yadav ◽  
Arko Lucieer ◽  
Susan C. Baker ◽  
Gregory J. Jordan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry F. Recher

ABSTRACT In Australia’s eucalypt forests and woodlands, co-habiting birds differ in the foraging manoeuvres or methods used to search for and take prey, the substrates and plants on which prey are found, and the heights at which foraging takes place. On the Southern Tablelands of New South Wales, eucalypt forest and woodland birds foraged on different substrates between study plots, seasons, and years. As a result, the proportions of foraging manoeuvres differed in space and time as different foraging methods were used to obtain food from different substrates. Of the 32 species tested for the summer of 1980/81, 24 foraged differently between one or more of the three plots studied. In winter, nine of 15 species on two plots foraged differently between plots. Differences in foraging were found between seasons and/or years for 20 species, including when data from individual plots were combined to test for differences in foraging between summer and winter. Of 70 comparisons of foraging behaviour for individual plots, that is, excluding combined plot data, 50 differed between seasons and/or years. Significant spatial and temporal differences in foraging were recorded for all foraging guilds. Bark and foliage foragers differed most frequently between pairs of plots in all seasons and years, with aerial foragers showing the fewest differences. Between seasons and years differences were greatest among ground-foragers and foliage-foragers where respectively 76% and 80% of intraspecies comparisons on individual plots differed. The differences were the result of temporal and spatial differences in the types and abundances of foraging substrates and the prey available to foraging birds. Each species has its own unique requirements and management targeted at one or a few species will disadvantage others. Consequently temporal and spatial habitat heterogeneity is necessary for the conservation of avian biodiversity.


Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 450
Author(s):  
Luke Collins ◽  
Adele Hunter ◽  
Sarah McColl-Gausden ◽  
Trent D. Penman ◽  
Philip Zylstra

Research highlights—Feedbacks between fire severity, vegetation structure and ecosystem flammability are understudied in highly fire-tolerant forests that are dominated by epicormic resprouters. We examined the relationships between the severity of two overlapping fires in a resprouting eucalypt forest and the subsequent effect of fire severity on fuel structure. We found that the likelihood of a canopy fire was the highest in areas that had previously been exposed to a high level of canopy scorch or consumption. Fuel structure was sensitive to the time since the previous canopy fire, but not the number of canopy fires. Background and Objectives—Feedbacks between fire and vegetation may constrain or amplify the effect of climate change on future wildfire behaviour. Such feedbacks have been poorly studied in forests dominated by highly fire-tolerant epicormic resprouters. Here, we conducted a case study based on two overlapping fires within a eucalypt forest that was dominated by epicormic resprouters to examine (1) whether past wildfire severity affects future wildfire severity, and (2) how combinations of understorey fire and canopy fire within reburnt areas affect fuel properties. Materials and Methods—The study focused on ≈77,000 ha of forest in south-eastern Australia that was burnt by a wildfire in 2007 and reburnt in 2013. The study system was dominated by eucalyptus trees that can resprout epicormically following fires that substantially scorch or consume foliage in the canopy layer. We used satellite-derived mapping to assess whether the severity of the 2013 fire was affected by the severity of the 2007 fire. Five levels of fire severity were considered (lowest to highest): unburnt, low canopy scorch, moderate canopy scorch, high canopy scorch and canopy consumption. Field surveys were then used to assess whether combinations of understorey fire (<80% canopy scorch) and canopy fire (>90% canopy consumption) recorded over the 2007 and 2013 fires caused differences in fuel structure. Results—Reburn severity was influenced by antecedent fire severity under severe fire weather, with the likelihood of canopy-consuming fire increasing with increasing antecedent fire severity up to those classes causing a high degree of canopy disturbance (i.e., high canopy scorch or canopy consumption). The increased occurrence of canopy-consuming fire largely came at the expense of the moderate and high canopy scorch classes, suggesting that there was a shift from crown scorch to crown consumption. Antecedent fire severity had little effect on the severity patterns of the 2013 fire under nonsevere fire weather. Areas affected by canopy fire in 2007 and/or 2013 had greater vertical connectivity of fuels than sites that were reburnt by understorey fires, though we found no evidence that repeated canopy fires were having compounding effects on fuel structure. Conclusions—Our case study suggests that exposure to canopy-defoliating fires has the potential to increase the severity of subsequent fires in resprouting eucalypt forests in the short term. We propose that the increased vertical connectivity of fuels caused by resprouting and seedling recruitment were responsible for the elevated fire severity. The effect of antecedent fire severity on reburn severity will likely be constrained by a range of factors, such as fire weather.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael H. Nolan ◽  
Alice Gauthey ◽  
Adriano Losso ◽  
Belinda E. Medlyn ◽  
Rhiannon Smith ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 105784
Author(s):  
Humberto de Jesus Eufrade-Junior ◽  
Elaine Cristina Leonello ◽  
Emanuel Rangel Spadim ◽  
Sérgio Augusto Rodrigues ◽  
Gileno Brito de Azevedo ◽  
...  

Fire ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Suyanti Winoto-Lewin ◽  
Jennifer Sanger ◽  
James Kirkpatrick

The authors were informed of some errors in the categorization of forest types by a colleague [...]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document