nursing licensure
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

21
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
Donna D. Ignatavicius

Author(s):  
Ting Yao ◽  
Cheryl Frutchey ◽  
Eman Alslman ◽  
Denise Burton

AbstractObjectivesThe purpose of this paper was to compare test plans between the National Council Licensure Examination-Registered Nurse (NCLEX-RN) in the United States and the National Nursing Licensure Examination (NNLE) in China, to discuss the influence of passing standards and critical thinking in the test plans on candidates and nursing education, and to provide implications to improve the NNLE test plan.MethodsAfter reading the 2019 NCLEX-RN test plan and the 2019 NNLE test plan, a side-by-side comparison was done to evaluate both test plans.ResultsIn the NCLEX-RN test plan, a periodical RN practice analysis provides fundamental principles for the development of test content based on the Client Needs framework. Item writing and coding is guided by the theory of Bloom’s taxonomy. The passing standard for the NCLEX-RN is based on a criterion-referenced method to assess candidates’ competencies as newly licensed nurses. In the NNLE test plan, test content comprises primary nursing tasks, nursing knowledge, and knowledge of common diseases. The standard score, a norm-referenced method, is used as the passing standard. The NNLE test plan does not present information concerning principles used in the development of test content, and the guidance related to item writing and coding.ConclusionThe NCLEX-RN provides systematic and evidence-based procedures to determine and evaluate test content and passing standards as compared with the NNLE. The standard score used in the NNLE disadvantages candidates of secondary nursing education. The lack of principles to guide item writing and coding in the NNLE fails to foster students’ critical thinking. To improve the NNLE test plan, further research should be conducted to improve test content, item writing, and examination evaluation methods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yeon Ok Suh ◽  
In Sook Park ◽  
Sun Young Hwang ◽  
So Young Kang ◽  
Sujin Shin

Author(s):  
Omobola Oyeleye

This article examines the provisions of the Nursing Licensure Compact (NLC). Key provisions of this compact are reviewed with examples of how it has impacted individual nurses. The article begins by presenting the history of the NLC, followed by discussion about the effective and implementation dates and a review of key provisions of the enhanced Nurse Licensure Compact. Specific examples of disciplinary actions and implications for nurses, employers, and educators are presented. The author concludes that most nurses provide competent care, and that outside of this compact, the few who violate laws and regulations are usually disciplined by their individual state board of nursing. Under the compact, however, those violations are addressed in all jurisdictions in which the nurse holds a nursing license or a privilege to practice, thereby ensuring public safety and preventing errant nurses from moving undetected from state to state.


Author(s):  
Margaret J. Halter ◽  
Donna G. Rolin ◽  
Mona Adamaszek ◽  
Miles C. Ladenheim ◽  
Bridget Frese Hutchens

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document