Application of tools to support Linked Open Data

Purpose These projects aim to improve library services for users in the future by combining Link Open Data (LOD) technology with data visualization. It displays and analyses search results in an intuitive manner. These services are enhanced by integrating various LOD technologies into the authority control system. Design/methodology/approach The technology known as LOD is used to access, recycle, share, exchange and disseminate information, among other things. The applicability of Linked Data technologies for the development of library information services is evaluated in this study. Findings Apache Hadoop is used for rapidly storing and processing massive Linked Data data sets. Apache Spark is a free and open-source data processing tool. Hive is a SQL-based data warehouse that enables data scientists to write, read and manage petabytes of data. Originality/value The distributed large data storage system Apache HBase does not use SQL. This study’s goal is to search the geographic, authority and bibliographic databases for relevant links found on various websites. When data items are linked together, all of the data bits are linked together as well. The study observed and evaluated the tools and processes and recorded each data item’s URL. As a result, data can be combined across silos, enhanced by third-party data sources and contextualized.

Pengolahan Kaset Rekaman Video: Studi Kasus di Pusat Dokumentasi Video Jogja TV

This study discusses the processing of video recording collections in Pusat Dokumentasi Video Jogja TV. The objectives are identification management video recording collections in there and special characteristic of the system has been applied. This is qualitative-descriptive research with a case study design. Data were collected by observation and interview with the related informants. Findings of this study was suggesting for upgrading the system has been applied and the need for being subject indexing that controlled by the authority control. It will make an easy way for the information retrieval process.

The strongest link: libraries and linked data

Since 1999 the W3C has been working on a set of Semantic Web standards that have the potential to revolutionize web search. Also known as Linked Data, the Machine‐Readable Web, the Web of Data, or Web3.0, the Semantic Web relies on highly structured metadata that allow computers to understand the relationships between objects. Semantic web standards are complex, and difficult to conceptualize, but they offer solutions to many of the issues that plague libraries, including precise web search, authority control, classification, data portability, and disambiguation. This article will outline some of the benefits that linked data could have for libraries, will discuss some of the non‐technical obstacles that we face in moving forward, and will finally offer suggestions for practical ways in which libraries can participate in the development of the semantic web.

Present state of normative current support of the National Bibliography in Bulgaria

The Bulgarian National Bibliography has been based on a tradition related to the normative support of its creation, development and potential for international cooperation. The Bulgarian National Bibliography has been created by law, which is strictly observed by St. Cyril and Methodius National Library. The rules and standards of bibliographic records and authority control, reviewed in the report, have been applied to the Bulgarian National Bibliography bulletins according to the IFLA international requirements. They give a good opportunity to the Bulgarian National Bibliography to participate in the international exchange of bibliographic and authority data.

Meeting the Challenge of the Preventive State: Due Process Rights and the Terrorism Suppression (Control Orders) Act 2019

This article focuses on the control order regime introduced by the Terrorism Suppression (Control Orders) Act 2019 and its implications for due process rights. Control orders are formally civil, and so the heightened criminal procedural protections in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the NZ Bill of Rights) ostensibly do not apply. But the simplicity of the criminal–civil binary belies the hybridity of control orders. In this respect, control orders capture in microcosm the larger policy shift towards a "preventive state" which, rather than relying on ex post facto denunciation, pre-emptively incapacitates threatening individuals before they commit harm. This article assesses how we should deal with control orders' hybridity. It suggests that on the basis of current authority, control orders would not attract the criminal procedural protection in s 25 of the NZ Bill of Rights. Instead, they will be governed by s 27(1), which secures a right to natural justice. It then critically assesses this result. Drawing on the work of Andrew Ashworth and Lucia Zedner, it canvasses four possible approaches to control orders. It argues that, in order to facilitate engagement with their distinctive and problematic features, control orders ought to be distinguished from punishment and dealt with under other provisions of the NZ Bill of Rights. This should stimulate discussion about the kind of procedural protections that are appropriate to safely balance the liberty interests of the subject against legitimate security concerns.