primary error
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

4
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
pp. 60-64
Author(s):  
Yu.A. Morgunov ◽  
B.P. Saushkin ◽  
N.V. Homyakova

The achieved accuracy in the electrochemical performance of understatement with a depth of 18 mcm with a tolerance of 4.5 mcm in a flow-through interelectrode channel is studied. The primary error of the size. The allowed absolute and relative errors of processing mode parameters are set. Keywords: UNDERSTATEMENT, ELECTROCHEMICAL MACHINING, ERROR, PRECISION SIZE, TOLERANCE, PROCESSING MODE. [email protected]


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (20) ◽  
pp. 2400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li ◽  
Jamet ◽  
Zhu ◽  
Han ◽  
Li ◽  
...  

The accuracy of remote-sensing reflectance (Rrs) estimated from ocean color imagery through the atmospheric correction step is essential in conducting quantitative estimates of the inherent optical properties and biogeochemical parameters of seawater. Therefore, finding the main source of error is the first step toward improving the accuracy of Rrs. However, the classic validation exercises provide only the total error of the retrieved Rrs. They do not reveal the error sources. Moreover, how to effectively improve this satellite algorithm remains unknown. To better understand and improve various aspects of the satellite atmospheric correction algorithm, the error budget in the validation is required. Here, to find the primary error source from the OLCI Rrs, we evaluated the OLCI Rrs product with in-situ data around the China Sea from open ocean to coastal waters and compared them with the MODIS-AQUA and VIIRS products. The results show that the performances of OLCI are comparable to those MODIS-AQUA. The average percentage difference (APD) in Rrs is lowest at 490 nm (18%), and highest at 754 nm (79%). A more detailed analysis reveals that open ocean and coastal waters show opposite results: compared to coastal waters the satellite Rrs in open seas are higher than the in-situ measured values. An error budget for the three satellite-derived Rrs products is presented, showing that the primary error source in the China Sea was the aerosol estimation and the error on the Rayleigh-corrected radiance for OLCI, as well as for MODIS and VIIRS. This work suggests that to improve the accuracy of Sentinel-3A in the coastal waters of China, the accuracy of aerosol estimation in atmospheric correction must be improved.


2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (10) ◽  
pp. 3485-3500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason E. Nachamkin ◽  
Jerome Schmidt ◽  
Cristian Mitrescu

Abstract Operational cloud forecasts generated by the Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS)1 were verified over the eastern Pacific Ocean. The study focused on the accuracy of cloud forecasts associated with extratropical cyclone and convective activity during the late winter and spring of 2007. The condensed total water (liquid and solid) path was used as a proxy for cloud cover to compare the forecasts with retrievals from the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES). Analyses of the GOES retrievals indicate that deep cloud systems were generally well represented during daylight hours. Thus, the bulk of the verification focused on the general aspects of quality and timing of these deep systems. Multiple statistics were collected, ranging from simple correlations and histograms to more sophisticated fuzzy and composite statistics. The results show that synoptic-scale systems were generally well predicted to at least two days, with the primary error being an overestimation of deep cloud occurrence. Smaller subsynoptic-scale systems were subject to spatial and timing biases in that a number of the forecasts were lagged by 3–6 h. Despite the bias, 60%–70% of the forecasts of the mesoscale phenomena displayed useful skill.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document