25mg daily
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

0
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongmei Liu ◽  
Binbin Zhou ◽  
Zhen Li ◽  
Zhuojun Zhang ◽  
Xiaojuan Dai ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Benzbromarone and febuxostat have different mechanisms in reducing serum urate. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of benzbromarone versus febuxostat in reducing serum urate in gouty patients classified with different types of hyperuricemia remain unclear.Methods In this retrospective study from January 1, 2018 to September 30, 2020, subjects were retrieved if they were newly treated with benzbromarone 25mg daily or febuxostat 20mg daily with 24-hour urinary uric acid and 24-hour urinary creatinine measured. Baseline data and follow-up information after 28 ± 3 days treatment were collected from medical records. Subjects were classified into four types according to their 24-hour urinary uric acid and fractional excretion of uric acid.Results A total of 73 subjects with gout were finally enrolled. Among them, 50 were treated with benzbromarone. The percent changes in serum urate from the baseline were -33.71 ± 13.59% in benzbromarone group and -29.45 ± 10.62% in febuxostat group without significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.188). In subgroup analysis, no differences were found between the two groups among subjects classified as renal underexcretion, the combined type, or “normal” type. In patients with eGFR ≥ 70 mL/min/1.73m2, the rate of serum urate lowering was higher in those treated with benzbromarone than febuxostat. Renal function did not change significantly from the baseline for both drugs.Conclusion Benzbromarone 25mg daily and febuxostat 20mg daily had comparable effectiveness in lowering serum urate among different types of hyperuricemia. Benzbromarone was more effective than febuxostat in lowering serum urate in subjects with eGFR ≥ 70 mL/min/1.73m2.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5712-5712
Author(s):  
Joseph Mikhael ◽  
Judi Manola ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Brendan M Weiss ◽  
Kurt Oettel ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Lenalidomide (Len) and dexamethasone (dex) has proven to be a highly effective treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) and serves as the basis of other combinations in relapsed disease. However, nearly 1/3 of myeloma patients have renal insufficiency, and the optimal use of Len in this population is not well known. We undertook this study in 3 cohorts of pts: Group A had creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 30-60 ml/min, Group B with CrCl < 30 ml/min, and Group C, with CrCl < 30 ml/min and requiring dialysis. The Phase I component of the trial has been previously reported (ASCO 2014) demonstrating that full dose Len (25mg daily 21/28 days) can be given to all patients despite renal insufficiency, even when on dialysis. We now present data on response to treatment. Methods: In the Phase 2 component accrual was slow and the trial was terminated. However, prior to termination a modified exploratory analysis plan was established, including all 34 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose. This plan would declare the treatment worthy of further study if 18 or more of the 34 patients responded to treatment. This design had 84% power to distinguish a response rate of 60% from a null rate of 40%, using a 1-sided test with 10% type I error. Results: The Phase 2 efficacy cohort accrued 34 patients, consisting of 20 patients from Group A, 9 patients from Group B, and 5 patients from Group C. Response of PR or greater was seen in 17 patients, resulting in a 50% overall response rate (CI 37-63%). Treatment was well tolerated with expected adverse events; the most common adverse events were anemia, diarrhea, and fatigue. Eleven episodes of Grade 3 and one Grade 4 pneumonia were reported for 10 patients across all cohorts and dose levels; 3 were considered possibly related to treatment. Seventeen patients have remained on treatment for more than 12 cycles. In the exploratory analyses, median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.6 - 19.7 months) and median OS was 19.7 months (95% CI, 10.4 - 42.5 months). Conclusions: Len Dex can be safely administered to patients with impaired renal function at full dose of 25mg daily 21/28 days, and is associated with a 50% response rate. Further investigation into other combinations with Len Dex in patients with renal impairment should be considered. Table Table. Disclosures Mikhael: Onyx: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lonial:Merck: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Weiss:Novartis: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document