Brachialis Muscle Activity Can Be Measured With Surface Electromyography: A Comparative Study Using Surface and Fine-Wire Electrodes

Muscle activities of the elbow flexors, especially the brachialis muscle (BR), have been measured with intramuscular electromyography (EMG) using the fine-wire electrodes. It remains unclear whether BR activity can be assessed using surface EMG. The purpose of this study was to compare the EMG patterns of the BR activity recorded during elbow flexion using surface and fine-wire electrodes and to determine whether surface EMG can accurately measure the BR activity. Six healthy men were asked to perform two tasks—a maximum isometric voluntary contractions (MVICs) task and an isotonic elbow-flexion task without lifting any weight. The surface and intramuscular EMG were simultaneously recorded from the BR and the long and short heads of the biceps brachii muscle (BBLH and BBSH, respectively). The locations of the muscles were identified and marked under ultrasonographic guidance. The peak cross-correlation coefficients between the EMG signals during the MVICs task were calculated. For the isotonic elbow-flexion task, the EMG patterns for activities of each muscle were compared between the surface and the fine-wire electrodes. All cross-correlation coefficients between the surface EMG signals from the muscles were lower than 0.3. Furthermore, the EMG patterns of the BR activity were not significantly different between the surface and the fine-wire electrodes. The BR has different EMG pattern from the BBLH and the BBSH. The BR activity, conventionally measured with intramuscular EMG, can be accurately accessed with surface EMG during elbow flexion performed without lifting any weight, independent from the BBLH and BBSH activities.

Anatomic relations of the median nerve to the ulnar insertion of the brachialis muscle: safety issues and implications for medial approaches to the elbow joint

Introduction Preventing nerve injury is critical in elbow surgery. Distal extension of medial approaches, required for coronoid fracture fixation and graft-replacement, may endanger the median nerve. This study aims to describe an easily identifiable and reproducible anatomical landmark to localize the median nerve distal to the joint line and to delineate how its relative position changes with elbow flexion and forearm rotation. Materials and methods The median nerve and the ulnar insertion of the brachialis muscle were identified in eleven fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens after dissection over an extended medial approach. The elbow was brought first in full extension and then in 90° flexion, and the shortest distance between the two structures was measured while rotating the forearm in full pronation, neutral position and full supination. Results The distance between the median nerve and the brachialis insertion was highest with the elbow flexed and the forearm in neutral position. All distances measured in flexion were larger than those in extension, and all distances measured from the most proximal point of the brachialis insertion were larger than those from the most distal point. Distances in pronation and in supination were smaller than to those in neutral forearm position. Conclusions The ulnar insertion of the brachialis is a reliable landmark to localize and protect the median nerve at the level of the coronoid base. Elbow flexion and neutral forearm position increase significantly the safety margins between the two structures; this information suggests some modifications to the previously described medial elbow approaches. Level of evidence Basic Science Study.

The co-occurrence of a four-headed coracobrachialis muscle, split coracoid process and tunnel for the median and musculocutaneous nerves: the potential clinical relevance of a very rare variation

The coracobrachialis muscle (CBM) originates from the apex of the coracoid process, in common with the short head of the biceps brachii muscle, and from the intermuscular septum. Both the proximal and distal attachment of the CBM, as well as its relationship with the musculocutaneus nerve demonstrate morphological variability, some of which can lead to many diseases. The present case study presents a new description of a complex origin type (four-headed CBM), as well as the fusion of both the short biceps brachii head, brachialis muscle and medial head of the triceps brachii. In addition, the first and second heads formed a tunnel for the musculocutaneus and median nerves. This case report has clear clinical value due to the split mature of the coracoid process, and is a significant indicator of the development of interest in this overlooked muscle.