compatible genes
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

12
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Qianxi Fan ◽  
Mingju E ◽  
Yusheng Wei ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Haitao Wang

Producing two broods within the same season may be a good strategy by which short-lived species can maximize reproductive success. To produce two clutches in the same breeding season and to ensure offspring quality, choosing a good mate is important for females. Previous studies on double breeding focused on the associated influencing factors, and few studies examined how females choose social mates. Good genes and genetic compatibility are the two main hypotheses of the genetic benefit that females obtain from choosing mates. Uncovering the method used in mate choice for genetic benefits adopted by double-breeding females would provide a better understanding of the life history and rules of female choice. The great tit is an optionally double-breeding species in temperate-latitude populations. Here, we used a dataset for a Chinese population monitored between 2014 and 2016 to test two hypotheses on double-breeding female mate choice. A total of 30.1% of the breeding pairs initiated second breeding attempts, always remating with the same mate. The date of the first egg of the first brood did not affect initiation of a second brood, and female individual heterozygosity slightly influenced initiation of a second breeding. Female great tits choose males with both compatible genes and good genes in double-breeding mating. Double-breeding females prefer males with large breast stripes, high heterozygosity, and lower relatedness, while tarsus length, repertoire size, and individual F are not the main factors considered by females when selecting males for double breeding. The number of offspring of the first clutch did not affect the pairing status of male great tits in double breeding. The genetic quality of offspring from double-breeding pairs was higher than that of those from single-breeding pairs (higher heterozygosity and lower individual F). Taken together, our results showed that double breeding female great tits adopt multiple methods for genetic benefits to choose mates.


Science ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 329 (5994) ◽  
pp. 964-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Pryke ◽  
L. A. Rollins ◽  
S. C. Griffith

2009 ◽  
Vol 174 (5) ◽  
pp. 741-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikael Puurtinen ◽  
Tarmo Ketola ◽  
J. S. Kotiaho

2008 ◽  
Vol 276 (1655) ◽  
pp. 337-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Schmoll ◽  
Frank M Schurr ◽  
Wolfgang Winkel ◽  
Joerg T Epplen ◽  
Thomas Lubjuhn

The hypothesis that females of socially monogamous species obtain indirect benefits (good or compatible genes) from extra-pair mating behaviour has received enormous attention but much less generally accepted support. Here we ask whether selection for adult survival and fecundity or sexual selection contribute to indirect selection of the extra-pair mating behaviour in socially monogamous coal tits ( Periparus ater ). We tracked locally recruited individuals with known paternity status through their lives predicting that the extra-pair offspring (EPO) would outperform the within-pair offspring (WPO). No differences between the WPO and EPO recruits were detected in lifespan or age of first reproduction. However, the male WPO had a higher lifetime number of broods and higher lifetime number of social offspring compared with male EPO recruits, while no such differences were evident for female recruits. Male EPO recruits did not compensate for their lower social reproductive success by higher fertilization success within their social pair bonds. Thus, our results do not support the idea that enhanced adult survival, fecundity or within-pair fertilization success are manifestations of the genetic benefits of extra-pair matings. But we emphasize that a crucial fitness component, the extra-pair fertilization success of male recruits, has yet to be taken into account to fully appreciate the fitness consequences of extra-pair matings.


Genetica ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Wedekind ◽  
Guillaume Evanno ◽  
Davnah Urbach ◽  
Alain Jacob ◽  
Rudolf Müller

Genetica ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Wedekind ◽  
Guillaume Evanno ◽  
Davnah Urbach ◽  
Alain Jacob ◽  
Rudolf Müller

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
J PIALEK ◽  
T ALBRECHT
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document