border rank
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

35
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Conner ◽  
Fulvio Gesmundo ◽  
Joseph M. Landsberg ◽  
Emanuele Ventura

AbstractWe prove that the border rank of the Kronecker square of the little Coppersmith–Winograd tensor $$T_{cw,q}$$ T c w , q is the square of its border rank for $$q > 2$$ q > 2 and that the border rank of its Kronecker cube is the cube of its border rank for $$q > 4$$ q > 4 . This answers questions raised implicitly by Coppersmith & Winograd (1990, §11) and explicitly by Bläser (2013, Problem 9.8) and rules out the possibility of proving new upper bounds on the exponent of matrix multiplication using the square or cube of a little Coppersmith–Winograd tensor in this range.In the positive direction, we enlarge the list of explicit tensors potentially useful for Strassen's laser method, introducing a skew-symmetric version of the Coppersmith–Winograd tensor, $$T_{skewcw,q}$$ T s k e w c w , q . For $$q = 2$$ q = 2 , the Kronecker square of this tensor coincides with the $$3\times 3$$ 3 × 3 determinant polynomial, $$\det_{3} \in \mathbb{C}^{9} \otimes \mathbb{C}^{9} \otimes \mathbb{C}^{9}$$ det 3 ∈ C 9 ⊗ C 9 ⊗ C 9 , regarded as a tensor. We show that this tensor could potentially be used to show that the exponent of matrix multiplication is two.We determine new upper bounds for the (Waring) rank and the (Waring) border rank of $$\det_3$$ det 3 , exhibiting a strict submultiplicative behaviour for $$T_{skewcw,2}$$ T s k e w c w , 2 which is promising for the laser method.We establish general results regarding border ranks of Kronecker powers of tensors, and make a detailed study of Kronecker squares of tensors in $$\mathbb{C}^{3} \otimes \mathbb{C}^{3} \otimes \mathbb{C}^{3}$$ C 3 ⊗ C 3 ⊗ C 3 .


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 425-433
Author(s):  
Siddharth Krishna ◽  
Visu Makam

The tensor rank and border rank of the $3 \times 3$ determinant tensor are known to be $5$ if the characteristic is not two. In characteristic two, the existing proofs of both the upper and lower bounds fail. In this paper, we show that the tensor rank remains $5$ for fields of characteristic two as well.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 503-527
Author(s):  
M. Christandl ◽  
F. Gesmundo ◽  
M. Michałek ◽  
J. Zuiddam

2021 ◽  
Vol -1 (-1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weronika Buczyńska ◽  
Jarosław Buczyński
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 378 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 1505-1532
Author(s):  
Hang Huang ◽  
Mateusz Michałek ◽  
Emanuele Ventura

Abstract Wild forms are homogeneous polynomials whose smoothable rank is strictly larger than their border rank. The discrepancy between these two ranks is caused by the difference between the limit of spans of a family of zero-dimensional schemes and the span of their flat limit. For concise forms of minimal border rank, we show that the condition of vanishing Hessian is equivalent to being wild. This is proven by making a detour through structure tensors of smoothable and Gorenstein algebras. The equivalence fails in the non-minimal border rank regime. We exhibit an infinite series of minimal border rank wild forms of every degree $$d\ge 3$$ d ≥ 3 as well as an infinite series of wild cubics. Inspired by recent work on border apolarity of Buczyńska and Buczyński, we study the border varieties of sums of powers $$\underline{{\mathrm {VSP}}}$$ VSP ̲ of these forms in the corresponding multigraded Hilbert schemes.


Author(s):  
Edoardo Ballico ◽  
Alessandra Bernardi ◽  
Fulvio Gesmundo ◽  
Alessandro Oneto ◽  
Emanuele Ventura

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-255
Author(s):  
Matthias Christandl ◽  
Fulvio Gesmundo ◽  
Asger Kjærulff Jensen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document