border effects
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

219
(FIVE YEARS 31)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 104326
Author(s):  
Bodo Knoll ◽  
Nadine Riedel ◽  
Thomas Schwab ◽  
Maximilian Todtenhaupt ◽  
Johannes Voget

World Economy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Franco‐Bedoya ◽  
Erik Frohm

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1592
Author(s):  
Nikolai Knapp ◽  
Andreas Huth ◽  
Rico Fischer

The estimation of forest biomass by remote sensing is constrained by different uncertainties. An important source of uncertainty is the border effect, as tree crowns are not constrained by plot borders. Lidar remote sensing systems record the canopy height within a certain area, while the ground-truth is commonly the aboveground biomass of inventory trees geolocated at their stem positions. Hence, tree crowns reaching out of or into the observed area are contributing to the uncertainty in canopy-height–based biomass estimation. In this study, forest inventory data and simulations of a tropical rainforest’s canopy were used to quantify the amount of incoming and outgoing canopy volume and surface at different plot sizes (10, 20, 50, and 100 m). This was performed with a bottom-up approach entirely based on forest inventory data and allometric relationships, from which idealized lidar canopy heights were simulated by representing the forest canopy as a 3D voxel space. In this voxel space, the position of each voxel is known, and it is also known to which tree each voxel belongs and where the stem of this tree is located. This knowledge was used to analyze the role of incoming and outgoing crowns. The contribution of the border effects to the biomass estimation uncertainty was quantified for the case of small-footprint lidar (a simulated canopy height model, CHM) and large-footprint lidar (simulated waveforms with footprint sizes of 23 and 65 m, corresponding to the GEDI and ICESat GLAS sensors). A strong effect of spatial scale was found: e.g., for 20-m plots, on average, 16% of the CHM surface belonged to trees located outside of the plots, while for 100-m plots this incoming CHM fraction was only 3%. The border effects accounted for 40% of the biomass estimation uncertainty at the 20-m scale, but had no contribution at the 100-m scale. For GEDI- and GLAS-based biomass estimates, the contributions of border effects were 23% and 6%, respectively. This study presents a novel approach for disentangling the sources of uncertainty in the remote sensing of forest structures using virtual canopy modeling.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Zimmermann ◽  
Andreas Bublitz ◽  
Dogan Keles ◽  
Wolf Fichtner
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 100820
Author(s):  
Fabio Franch ◽  
Luca Nocciola ◽  
Dawid Żochowski

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0247712
Author(s):  
Joep Steegmans ◽  
Jonathan de Bruin

In this paper we apply a gravity framework to user-generated data of a large online housing market platform. We show that gravity describes the patterns of inflow and outflow of hits (mouse clicks, etc.) from one municipality to another, where the municipality of the user defines the origin and the municipality of the property that is viewed defines the destination. By distinguishing serious searchers from recreational searchers we demonstrate that the gravity framework describes geographic search patterns of both types of users. The results indicate that recreational search is centered more around the user’s location than serious search. However, this finding is driven entirely by differences in border effects as there is no difference in the distance effect. By demonstrating that geographic search patterns of both serious and recreational searchers are explained by their physical locations, we present clear evidence that physical location is an important determinant of economic behavior in the virtual realm too.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Berta ◽  
Massimiliano Bratti ◽  
Carlo V. Fiorio ◽  
Enrico Pisoni ◽  
Stefano Verzillo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document