kin investment
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

16
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
jenni pettay ◽  
Mirkka Danielsbacka ◽  
Samuli Helle ◽  
Antti O Tanskanen

Evolutionarily relevant nepotistic kin investment requires reliable kin detection. Evolutionary scholars have argued that childhood co-residence is one of the most important indirect cues for kinship. While childhood co-residence duration has been found to correlate with kin investment in intragenerational studies (i.e., among siblings), intergenerational investigations considering the association between childhood co-residence duration and kin investment have been scarce. Here, we investigate whether the investment of biological and stepfathers is correlated with childhood co-residence duration. We used data from adolescents and adults (aged 17–19, 27–29, and 37–39 years) from the German Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (Pairfam), wave 2, collected in 2010–2011. Paternal investment was measured as financial and practical help, emotional support, intimacy, and emotional closeness. We found that while stepfathers invested less than biological fathers, both biological and stepfathers’ investments increased with increased childhood co-residence duration in most measures. Financial help correlated with childhood co-residence in stepfathers but not in biological fathers who helped financially more than stepfathers regardless of childhood co-residence duration. Emotional support, intimacy, and emotional closeness were correlated with childhood co-residence in both biological fathers and stepfathers. Practical help did not correlate with co-residence in either father. Thus, our results partially support the hypothesis that childhood co-residence duration serves as a kin detection cue and directs intergenerational altruism.



Author(s):  
Hans Hämäläinen ◽  
Antti O Tanskanen ◽  
Mirkka Danielsbacka




Author(s):  
Hans Hämäläinen ◽  
Antti O. Tanskanen ◽  
Mirkka Danielsbacka


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 147470491663121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Pashos ◽  
Sascha Schwarz ◽  
David F. Bjorklund
Keyword(s):  


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Z. Gold ◽  
David S. Friedman ◽  
Jacklyn M. Sullivan ◽  
Stephen Sullivan


2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich S. Tran ◽  
Maryanne L. Fisher ◽  
Martin Voracek


2009 ◽  
Vol 277 (1681) ◽  
pp. 567-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly Fox ◽  
Rebecca Sear ◽  
Jan Beise ◽  
Gillian Ragsdale ◽  
Eckart Voland ◽  
...  

Biologists use genetic relatedness between family members to explain the evolution of many behavioural and developmental traits in humans, including altruism, kin investment and longevity. Women's post-menopausal longevity in particular is linked to genetic relatedness between family members. According to the ‘grandmother hypothesis’, post-menopausal women can increase their genetic contribution to future generations by increasing the survivorship of their grandchildren. While some demographic studies have found evidence for this, others have found little support for it. Here, we re-model the predictions of the grandmother hypothesis by examining the genetic relatedness between grandmothers and grandchildren. We use this new model to re-evaluate the grandmother effect in seven previously studied human populations. Boys and girls differ in the per cent of genes they share with maternal versus paternal grandmothers because of differences in X-chromosome inheritance. Here, we demonstrate a relationship between X-chromosome inheritance and grandchild mortality in the presence of a grandmother. With this sex-specific and X-chromosome approach to interpreting mortality rates, we provide a new perspective on the prevailing theory for the evolution of human female longevity. This approach yields more consistent support for the grandmother hypothesis, and has implications for the study of human evolution.



2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Heijkoop ◽  
Judith Semon Dubas ◽  
Marcel A. G. van Aken


Human Nature ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna L. Leonetti


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document