Atlantoaxial Stabilization by Posterior C1 and C2 Screw-Rod Fixation for Various Pathologies: Case Series and Comprehensive Review of Literature

We retrospectively analyzed atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) of various pathologies, namely, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), os odontoideum, and trauma. Various techniques were discussed in relation to C1-C2 stabilization. The study aims to share our clinical experience in a series of six cases of C1-C2 instability that underwent posterior C1-C2 fusion, with free hand technique and limited fluoroscopy. The clinicoradiological presentation for each patient is described. We reviewed different literatures related to our case vividly and focused on the basic neuroanatomy involved in the atlantoaxial joint. All patients of AAD had evidence of severe canal compromise and chronic compressive spinal cord changes. In our study, the patients age ranged from 28 to 52 years. The study included four males and two females. Out of six patients of AAD, three had history of trauma, two had os odontoideum, and one had chronic inflammatory condition (RA). From our case series, we concluded that the Goel–Harms technique is the most versatile and surgeon friendly technique for C1-C2 fixation. Early recognition and surgical intervention of atlantoaxial joint instability is essential to prevent catastrophic neurological complications.

Mobilization of the Vertebral Artery—Surgical Option for C2 Screw Fixation in Cases With “High Riding” Vertebral Artery

BACKGROUND Mobilization of intraosseous course of vertebral artery for safe screw insertion into pedicle of axis in cases with high riding vertebral artery is discussed. OBJECTIVE To show drilling, exposure, and mobilization of the “high-riding” vertebral artery loop during its course in relationship with superior facet/pedicle of C2 vertebra can provide safety to techniques of atlantoaxial fixation that involve insertion of screws in the pars/pedicle/facet of C2. METHODS During the period June 2016 to April 2018, 15 patients operated for atlantoaxial stabilization underwent vertebral artery exposure and mobilization using the technique discussed. The ages of the patients ranged from 6 to 48 yrs. Four patients had mobile and reducible atlantoaxial dislocation. Seven patients had basilar invagination. Four patients had os-odontoideum. Gentle and precise drilling of bone that covers the “high-riding” vertebral artery can lead to its safe and wide surgical exposure. The arterial loop can then be either completely or partially mobilized out of the vertebral artery groove such that C2 screw insertion can be conducted under direct surgical visualization of the vertebral artery. RESULTS During the average follow-up period of 14 mo, there have been no complications related to the surgical procedure, metal implant, or vertebral artery. CONCLUSION Vertebral artery exposure and mobilization is rather simple and safe procedure and is remarkably effective in providing a space for C2 screw implantation.

Computed Tomography and Biomechanical Comparison between Trans-Articular Screw Fixation and 2 Polymethylmethacrylate Cemented Constructs for Ventral Atlantoaxial Stabilization

Objectives Canine ventral atlantoaxial stabilization methods have been constantly evolving over the past few decades. Yet, proper experimental data comparing the feasibility and biomechanical properties of currently available surgical options are lacking. The aims of this study were (1) to describe and compare the safety profiles and biomechanical properties of three ventral atlantoaxial stabilization methods; and (2) to test whether recently reported optimal implant definitions constitute reasonable guidelines. Methods Three types of atlantoaxial stabilization including trans-articular screw fixation (TSF) and two cemented constructs (MI5 and MI6) were performed in 21 Beagle cadavers. Post-surgical computed tomography (CT) images of the constructs and biomechanical data were then generated and statistically analysed. Results The CT data revealed that TSF achieved significantly better apposition than cemented constructs. Out of 91 screws positioned, 4.4% were graded as dangerous and 86.8% as optimal. Optimal positioning was most challenging to obtain for mono-cortical screws. Analysis of biomechanical data suggested that all three techniques could likely achieve similar rates of atlantoaxial fusion when submitted to physiological loads but also that cemented constructs were less prone to failure compared with TSF. Clinical Significance This study provides evidence that all three techniques are technically feasible and biomechanically viable but also that the evaluated surgical guidelines could be improved.

Atlantoaxial Stabilization Using C1 and C2 Laminar Screw Fixation

<p>We describe the use of a C1 laminar screw in combination with a C2 laminar screw as a salvage technique to treat two patients, one with persistent first intersegmental artery and the other with vertebral artery occlusion after cervical spine fracture. The combined use of C1 and C2 laminar screws allows for good fixation of the atlantoaxial joint with a lower risk of vertebral artery injury; therefore, it can be an alternative surgical procedure for patients with congenital or traumatic anomalous vertebral artery.</p>

Computed Tomographic Analysis of Ventral Atlantoaxial Optimal Safe Implantation Corridors in 27 Dogs

Objectives Ventral atlantoaxial stabilization techniques are challenging surgical procedures in dogs. Available surgical guidelines are based upon subjective anatomical landmarks, and limited radiographic and computed tomographic data. The aims of this study were (1) to provide detailed anatomical descriptions of atlantoaxial optimal safe implantation corridors to generate objective recommendations for optimal implant placements and (2) to compare anatomical data obtained in non-affected Toy breed dogs, affected Toy breed dogs suffering from atlantoaxial instability and non-affected Beagle dogs. Methods Anatomical data were collected from a prospectively recruited population of 27 dogs using a previously validated method of optimal safe implantation corridor analysis using computed tomographic images. Results Optimal implant positions and three-dimensional numerical data were generated successfully in all cases. Anatomical landmarks could be used to generate objective definitions of optimal insertion points which were applicable across all three groups. Overall the geometrical distribution of all implant sites was similar in all three groups with a few exceptions. Clinical Significance This study provides extensive anatomical data available to facilitate surgical planning of implant placement for atlantoaxial stabilization. Our data suggest that non-affected Toy breed dogs and non-affected Beagle dogs constitute reasonable research models to study atlantoaxial stabilization constructs.