elbow anatomy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

27
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
pp. 219-222
Author(s):  
Tiffany Liu ◽  
Sara Edwards
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 5-36
Author(s):  
Eira S. Roth ◽  
Lulu He
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 63-77
Author(s):  
Deepak N. Bhatia

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 529-537
Author(s):  
Sameer Alidina ◽  
Jasim Alidina ◽  
Felipe Souza ◽  
Steven Kalandiak ◽  
Ty K. Subhawong

AbstractFractures and dislocations of the elbow are a common cause of emergency department visits each year. Radiography remains the bedrock of an initial injury assessment, and recognition of distinctive injury patterns based on fracture location, morphology, and severity, guides optimal clinical decision-making. This article reviews basic elbow anatomy, frequently seen fractures and injury patterns, and highlights how these findings influence surgical planning and patient management.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 3431
Author(s):  
Kamal Mezian ◽  
Jakub Jačisko ◽  
Tomáš Novotný ◽  
Laura Hrehová ◽  
Yvona Angerová ◽  
...  

Elbow pain is a prevalent condition in musculoskeletal physicians’ settings. The majority of cases present with periarticular pathologies (varying from tendinopathy to nerve entrapment syndrome). Nevertheless, in some cases, the underlying cause can be intra-articular, e.g., loose bodies or rheumatic disease. Progress in ultrasound (US) technology has yielded high-resolution assessment of the elbow and, importantly, allows real-time, radiation-free guidance for interventions. Particularly in ambiguous cases, US imaging is necessary to arrive at the correct diagnosis. The following four clinical conditions are covered: tennis elbow, golfer’s elbow, distal biceps, and distal triceps tendinopathy. The present review illustrates cadaveric elbow anatomy, corresponding US images, and exemplary pathologies. Additionally, the authors also discuss the existing evidence on ultrasound-guided procedures in the conditions mentioned above.


2021 ◽  
pp. 193-202
Author(s):  
Andrea Celli ◽  
Bartoli Matteo ◽  
Peruzzi Marco ◽  
Luigi Adriano Pederzini
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-99
Author(s):  
Saif Ul Islam ◽  
Alexander Glover ◽  
Robert J MacFarlane ◽  
Nisarg Mehta ◽  
Mohammad Waseem

A sound knowledge of the elbow anatomy and biomechanics is critical to understanding the pathology of various elbow disorders and instigating appropriate management. The elbow joint is a trochoginglymoid joint: that is, it has flexion-extension [ginglymoid] motion at the ulnohumeral and radiocapitellar articulations and pronation and supination [trochoid] motion at the proximal radioulnar joint. Stability of the elbow joint is achieved through static and dynamic components. The aim of this article is to concisely describe the anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow joint relevant to the practice of trauma and orthopaedic surgeons.


Sarcoma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Manit K. Gundavda ◽  
Manish G. Agarwal ◽  
Rajeev Reddy

Introduction. Limb salvage surgery following proximal ulna resection poses a challenge in reconstruction of the complex elbow anatomy. Various reconstruction methods described offer inadequate restoration of function and stability. Following resection of proximal ulna tumors, we aimed to restore the joint using the resected osteochondral segment of proximal ulna treated with extracorporeal irradiation and reimplantation. Questions/Purposes. (1) Does irradiated osteoarticular autograft reconstruction for proximal ulna allow anatomical joint restoration and what are the oncological and functional outcomes? (2) Is there evidence of graft-related complications or osteoarthritis at a minimum of 2 years follow-up with irradiated osteoarticular autografts for the proximal ulna? (3) How does our method of reconstruction fare as compared to reported reconstruction options in the literature? Materials and Methods. 3 patients with primary bone tumors involving the proximal ulna underwent limb salvage surgery with en bloc resection and reconstruction using the resected bone after treating it with extracorporeal irradiation of 50 Gy. Minimum follow-up of 2 years was considered for assessment of final outcomes. Radiographs were assessed for bony recurrence, union across osteotomy junction, and signs of joint arthritis. Functional outcome measures included range of movement, muscle power testing, and functional and disability scores. Results. 2 complete and 1 partial olecranon involving proximal ulnar resections were performed for three cases of Ewing’s sarcoma in 2 males and 1 female. Follow-up ranged from 28 to 42 months, and all patients continue to remain disease free. All 3 patients have achieved full range of flexion-extension and pronosupination movement in comparison to the contralateral side. Muscle power for flexion and extension was 5/5. MSTS score: 100% (30/30); MEPS score: 100; and DASH score: zero were achieved for all patients. Union across osteotomy junctions at median follow-up of 8 months without need for intervention/bone grafting was achieved. No complications related to joint laxity/subluxation, infection, graft fracture, or implant failure was noted. None of the patients have clinical or radiological signs of joint arthritis across the irradiated articulation. Conclusion. Biological restoration of elbow anatomy using osteoarticular irradiated graft for proximal ulna reconstruction offers great joint stability and functional outcomes. Although the potential risks of infection and graft failure need to be considered, reconstruction with the size-matched radiated autograft eliminates donor site morbidity, offers a low-cost alternative to endoprosthesis, and provides outcomes superior to any other methods of reconstruction as analyzed from the literature.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shota Hoshika ◽  
Akimoto Nimura ◽  
Reiko Yamaguchi ◽  
Hisayo Nasu ◽  
Kumiko Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document