New type of starch-binding domain: the direct repeat motif in the C-terminal region of Bacillus sp. no. 195 α-amylase contributes to starch binding and raw starch degrading

The α-amylase from Bacillus sp. no. 195 (BAA) consists of two domains: one is the catalytic domain similar to α-amylases from animals and Streptomyces in the N-terminal region; the other is the functionally unknown domain composed of an approx. 90-residue direct repeat in the C-terminal region. The gene coding for BAA was expressed in Streptomyces lividans TK24. Three active forms of the gene products were found. The pHand thermal profiles of BAAs, and their catalytic activities for p-nitrophenyl maltopentaoside and soluble starch, showed almost the same behaviours. The largest, 69kDa, form (BAA-α) was of the same molecular mass as that of the mature protein estimated from the nucleotide sequence, and had raw-starch-binding and -degrading abilities. The second largest, 60kDa, form (BAA-β), whose molecular mass was the same as that of the natural enzyme from Bacillus sp. no. 195, was generated by proteolytic processing between the two repeat sequences in the C-terminal region, and had lower activities for raw starch binding and degrading than those of BAA-α. The smallest, 50kDa, form (BAA-γ) contained only the N-terminal catalytic domain as a result of removal of the C-terminal repeat sequence, which led to loss of binding and degradation of insoluble starches. Thus the starch adsorption capacity and raw-starch-degrading activity of BAAs depends on the existence of the repeat sequence in the C-terminal region. BAA-α was specifically adsorbed on starch or dextran (α-1,4 or α-1,6glucan), and specifically desorbed with maltose or β-cyclodextrin. These observations indicated that the repeat sequence of the enzyme was functional in the starch-binding domain (SBD). We propose the designation of the homologues to the SBD of glucoamylase from Aspergillus niger as family I SBDs, the homologues to that of glucoamylase from Rhizopus oryzae as family II, and the homologues of this repeat sequence of BAA as family III.

Comparative Characterization of Complete and Truncated Forms of Lactobacillus amylovorus α-Amylase and Role of the C-Terminal Direct Repeats in Raw-Starch Binding

ABSTRACT Two constructs derived from the α-amylase gene (amyA) of Lactobacillus amylovorus were expressed inLactobacillus plantarum, and their expression products were purified, characterized, and compared. These products correspond to the complete (AmyA) and truncated (AmyAΔ) forms of α-amylase; AmyAΔ lacks the 66-kDa carboxyl-terminal direct-repeating-unit region. AmyA and AmyAΔ exhibit similar amylase activities towards a range of soluble substrates (amylose, amylopectin and α-cyclodextrin, and soluble starch). The specific activities of the enzymes towards soluble starch are similar, but the KM andV max values of AmyAΔ were slightly higher than those of AmyA, whereas the thermal stability of AmyAΔ was lower than that of AmyA. In contrast to AmyA, AmyAΔ is unable to bind to β-cyclodextrin and is only weakly active towards glycogen. More striking is the fact that AmyAΔ cannot bind or hydrolyze raw starch, demonstrating that the carboxyl-terminal repeating-unit domain of AmyA is required for raw-starch binding activity.

Introduction of Raw Starch-Binding Domains intoBacillus subtilis α-Amylase by Fusion with the Starch-Binding Domain of Bacillus Cyclomaltodextrin Glucanotransferase

ABSTRACT We constructed two types of chimeric enzymes, Ch1 Amy and Ch2 Amy. Ch1 Amy consisted of a catalytic domain of Bacillus subtilis X-23 α-amylase (Ba-S) and the raw starch-binding domain (domain E) of Bacillus A2-5a cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase (A2-5a CGT). Ch2 Amy consisted of Ba-S and D (function unknown) plus E domains of A2-5a CGT. Ch1 Amy acquired raw starch-binding and -digesting abilities which were not present in the catalytic part (Ba-S). Furthermore, the specific activity of Ch1 Amy was almost identical when enzyme activity was evaluated on a molar basis. Although Ch2 Amy exhibited even higher raw starch-binding and -digesting abilities than Ch1 Amy, the specific activity was lower than that of Ba-S. We did not detect any differences in other enzymatic characteristics (amylolytic pattern, transglycosylation ability, effects of pH, and temperature on stability and activity) among Ba-S, Ch1 Amy, and Ch2 Amy.