A Feature-Based Evaluation of Model Merge Methods for e-Health Solutions

Model-driven engineering (MDE) paradigm considers models as central artifacts for software development lifecycle during which models evolve. Developing an e-health solution using MDE poses challenges of model version control, model differencing and model merging, which requires appropriate software configuration management (SCM). In this paper we focus on model-driven merging, which refers to combining two or more versions of a model into a single consolidated version. SCM for model-driven merging leverages evolution of valid configurations, which is a highly desired behavior. Our investigation is based on the features that are required for model-driven SCM realization. Initially, we identify these features using which the existing model-driven merging techniques are evaluated. It is observed that though various proposals are made by academia and research community, a standard model-driven SCM solution that can cater to the needs of industry is still absent. This is in contrary to the situation of traditional SCM systems where standard solutions exist. We also present the usefulness of each technique along with the tradeoffs involved. Finally, guidelines are provided to select techniques appropriate for given circumstances.

A Feature-Based Evaluation of Model Merge Methods for e-Health Solutions

Model-driven engineering (MDE) paradigm considers models as central artifacts for software development lifecycle during which models evolve. Developing an e-health solution using MDE poses challenges of model version control, model differencing and model merging, which requires appropriate software configuration management (SCM). In this paper we focus on model-driven merging, which refers to combining two or more versions of a model into a single consolidated version. SCM for model-driven merging leverages evolution of valid configurations, which is a highly desired behavior. Our investigation is based on the features that are required for model-driven SCM realization. Initially, we identify these features using which the existing model-driven merging techniques are evaluated. It is observed that though various proposals are made by academia and research community, a standard model-driven SCM solution that can cater to the needs of industry is still absent. This is in contrary to the situation of traditional SCM systems where standard solutions exist. We also present the usefulness of each technique along with the tradeoffs involved. Finally, guidelines are provided to select techniques appropriate for given circumstances.

A Survey on Text-based Modeling in Model Evolution and Management

Model-driven software engineering methodologies like model-driven engineering aim to improve the productivity of software development by using graph-based models as the main artifacts during development, and generating the source code from these models. The models are usually displayed and edited using a graphical notation. However, they can also be described using a textual notation. This has some advantages and disadvantages compared to the graphical approach. For example, while editing the model, we can better focus on the details instead of a broad overview. Similarly to source code, models evolve rapidly during development. Handling and managing the evolution of models is an important task in model-driven methodologies and is an active research area today. However, there exist few research on text-based modeling approaches, compared to graph-based ones. This paper introduces the text-based modeling research field based on existing literature, and presents the state-of-the-art of the field related to model evolution and management. Our goal is to identify challenges and directions for future research in this field. The main topics covered are model differencing and merging, and the synchronization of the textual and graphical notations.

Using model differencing to reason about observable behavior changes of manufacturing systems

Understanding changes in a manufacturing system is of utmost importance to effectively manage its evolution. This article proposes a pattern-based approach for capturing and describing behavioral changes by integrating recent advantages in the fields of system monitoring and model differencing. Observed changes are described as lifted model differences between two model versions. This helps in explaining observable evolution with a change-first approach.

A Survey of Model Comparison Strategies and Techniques in Model Driven Engineering

This Survey paper shows the recent state of model comparison as it’s applies to Model Driven engineering. In Model Driven Engineering to calculate the difference between the models is a very important and challenging task. There are number of tasks involved in Model differencing that firstly starts with identifying and matching the elements of the model. In this paper we discuss how model matching is accomplished, the strategies, techniques and the types of the model. In this paper we also discuss the future direction. We find out that many of the latest model comparison strategies are geared near enabling Meta model and similarity based matching. Therefore model versioning is the most dominant application of the model comparison. Recently to work on comparison for versioning has begun to deteriorate, giving way to different applications. Ultimately there is wide change among the tools in the measure of client exertion needed to perform model comparisons, as some require more push to encourage more sweeping statement and expressive force.