compensatory photosynthesis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda Hart ◽  
E H Hogg ◽  
V J Lieffers

Stomatal conductance and leaf water potential of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) were measured in response to defoliation intensity, both in the field and under controlled conditions. There was evidence of increased stomatal conductance in trees with 50 and 98% defoliation, but no change in leaf water potential. Under controlled conditions, stomatal conductance and rate of photosynthesis were measured under high and low vapour pressure deficits (VPD). Under high VPD, overall stomatal conductance and rates of photosynthesis were greatly reduced. However, in both VPD treatments, there was evidence of increased stomatal conductance and compensatory photosynthesis following defoliation. These findings may be due to increases in leaf specific hydraulic conductance following defoliation.Key words: defoliation, stomatal conductance, leaf water potential, compensatory photosynthesis.


1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
G A Meyer

Plant responses to defoliation were examined using Solidago altissima and a leaf-chewing beetle (Trirhabda sp.). Plants were exposed to five intensities of defoliation (ranging from 0 to 85% leaf area loss) and effects on carbon gain, vegetative growth, and flowering were determined. Defoliated plants partially restored their capacity for carbon gain in the following ways: (i) activity of damaged leaves remaining after defoliation was increased via delayed senescence and enhanced photosynthetic rates and (ii) regrowth leaves on damaged plants had higher specific leaf area (leaf area per leaf mass) than comparable leaves on undamaged plants, but photosynthetic rates per unit area were equivalent to controls; thus, these leaves covered more area for a given investment in biomass with no loss in activity per unit area. Delayed leaf senescence and compensatory photosynthesis are commonly observed following defoliation, but increased specific leaf area is not generally recognized as a mechanism contributing to plant regrowth. In spite of these changes, total carbon gain capacity of defoliated plants was still less than that of controls after 3 weeks of regrowth. Overall plant performance was reduced by defoliation. Defoliated stems grew at a slower rate early in the season, added fewer new leaves in the first few weeks after defoliation, and had fewer lateral stems throughout the season. Damaged plants delayed flowering and maintained height growth later into the season than undamaged plants. Damaged stems reached heights comparable with undamaged stems by the end of the season, but they were thinner and their flower production was lower. Declines in plant growth and flowering were linear functions of the percentage leaf area loss, suggesting that even low levels of insect feeding are likely to affect plant performance.Key words: Solidago altissima, Trirhabda, defoliation, compensatory photosynthesis, insect herbivory, herbivore damage, plant compensation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document