The Effect of Aspirin on Moderate to Severe Asthmatic Patients with Aspirin Hypersensitivity, Chronic Rhinosinusitis, and Nasal Polyposis.

Asthmatic patients may have aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease and experience acute dyspnea and nasal symptoms within 3 hours after the ingestion of aspirin. This study aimed to evaluate the effect and outcome of daily low-dose aspirin in the treatment of moderate to severe asthma in patients with concomitant aspirin hypersensitivity and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). This clinical trial was conducted from February 2014 to February 2015 on 46 adult patients with moderate to severe asthma accompanied by CRSwNP. Patients with a positive aspirin challenge were blindly randomized in three groups receiving placebo/day (A); aspirin 100 mg/day (B); and aspirin 325mg/day (C), respectively. Clinical findings, FEV1 and ACT scores were recorded and compared before, during, and after treatment for 6 months (IRCT2015061521970N2). Of 46 participants at baseline, 30 patients completed this 6-month trial study. The level of asthma control was significant; based on Asthma Control Test (ACT) when comparing the results in groups A and C and also groups B and C, but it was not significant when comparing ACT scores between groups A and B. FEV1 before and after treatment was significant when comparing groups A and B, groups A and C, and groups B and C. To conclude, aspirin desensitization with a daily dose of 325 mg aspirin resulted in the improvement of long-term control of asthma. A daily aspirin dose of 100 mg was not associated with such an increase in ACT score.

Predictive factors for identifying macrolide responder in treating chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND: Low-dose macrolides (LDM) are anti-inflammatory agents with antineutrophilic activity, but patient selection for LDM therapy in treating chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is controversial. This study aimed to assess factors which predict LDM responders. METHODOLOGY: A prospective cohort study was performed. Patients with CRS received roxithromycin (150 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. Nasal secretions and serology were collected. Nine predictors for LDM response were assessed: nasal secretion IgE, nasal secretion IL-5, serum IgE, serum eosinophils, serum neutrophils, nasal polyps, asthma, allergy, and aspirin hypersensitivity, using receiver-operating curve analysis and multivariable logistic regression. Macrolide responders were those with sino-nasal outcome test-22 improvement, symptoms visual analogue scale decreased to ≤5, and no rescue medication. RESULTS: One hundred CRS patients (mean age 47.4±14.1 years, 45% male) were enrolled. Univariable logistic regression showed local total IgE less than 5.21; and serum eosinophils less than 2.2% associated with macrolide response. Multivariate models showed local total IgE maintained an independent association with macrolide response, with an ability to discriminate between responders and non-responders of 63%. Serum total IgE, nasal secretion IL-5, serum neutrophil, nasal polyp, asthma, allergy, and aspirin hypersensitivity showed no association with LDM response. CONCLUSIONS: Low total IgE level in the nasal secretion but not in the serum, predict LDM response.

Aspirin Hypersensitivity in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. What Should We be Doing?

Aspirin plays a pivotal role in the management of patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) with well-recognised benefits of reducing recurrent myocardial infarction and minimising the risk of stent thrombosis for those undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). Dual antiplatelet therapy is mandated for patients undergoing PCI and typically consists of aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist. Aspirin hypersensitivity poses a significant clinical dilemma, as the safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet combinations that exclude aspirin have not been validated. Although, genuine hypersensitivity to aspirin is encountered infrequently, it can be challenging when managing patients with concomitant CAD given the paucity of safe and effective alternatives. Aspirin desensitization is a potential and safe option but may not always be practical. This review aims to highlight the challenges of aspirin hypersensitivity in patients undergoing PCI and propose a treatment algorithm to address this issue in clinical practice.