Systematic Review of The Outcome of Different Modalities of Voice Rehabilitation Following Total Laryngectomy

Background Speech impairment occurs in 34-70% of head and neck oncologic patients. Management of this impairment is through surgical and nonsurgical methods. Progress in voice rehabilitation following total laryngectomy has over the last 30 years, made an enormous difference in the whole concept of the management of laryngeal cancers. Objective To explore the outcome of different options of voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy and the advantages and disadvantages of each method in order to improve the quality of life of laryngectomized patients and the suggestion of future directions for research. Patients and Methods The Aim of this work is to provide cumulative data about the efficacy and safety of the outcome of different modalities of voice rehabilitation following total laryngectomy. This review was done using standard methodology outlined in the Cochrane Handbook and reported the findings in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. Results Voice rehabilitation is one of the most important determinants of the quality of life after total laryngectomy. Recent advances in prosthetic voice devices have made such devices the gold standard for voice rehabilitation. They are thus preferred and used more often than old methods (esophageal speech and artificial larynx). Conclusion Although, no single method is considered to be the best for every patient, the tracheoesophageal puncture has become the most preferred method in the past decade. But it is not always possible in all patients, the results of this study indicate that ES, when achievable, is a viable option that should be considered by surgeons when making intervention decisions on patients, and should be revived when indicated. But we need much more studies.

An Acoustic Study of Vowels Produced by Alaryngeal Speakers in Taiwan

PurposeThis study investigated the acoustic properties of 6 Taiwan Southern Min vowels produced by 10 laryngeal speakers (LA), 10 speakers with a pneumatic artificial larynx (PA), and 8 esophageal speakers (ES).MethodEach of the 6 monophthongs of Taiwan Southern Min (/i, e, a, ɔ, u, ə/) was represented by a Taiwan Southern Min character and appeared randomly on a list 3 times (6 Taiwan Southern Min characters × 3 repetitions = 18 tokens). Each Taiwan Southern Min character in this study has the same syllable structure, /V/, and all were read with tone 1 (high and level). Acoustic measurements of the 1st formant, 2nd formant, and 3rd formant were taken for each vowel. Then, vowel space areas (VSAs) enclosed by /i, a, u/ were calculated for each group of speakers. The Euclidean distance between vowels in the pairs /i, a/, /i, u/, and /a, u/ was also calculated and compared across the groups.ResultsPA and ES have higher 1st or 2nd formant values than LA for each vowel. The distance is significantly shorter between vowels in the corner vowel pairs /i, a/ and /i, u/. PA and ES have a significantly smaller VSA compared with LA.ConclusionsIn accordance with previous studies, alaryngeal speakers have higher formant frequency values than LA because they have a shortened vocal tract as a result of their total laryngectomy. Furthermore, the resonance frequencies are inversely related to the length of the vocal tract (on the basis of the assumption of the source filter theory). PA and ES have a smaller VSA and shorter distances between corner vowels compared with LA, which may be related to speech intelligibility. This hypothesis needs further support from future study.