Novel Renal Autologous Cell Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Chronic Diabetic Kidney Disease: Clinical Trial Design

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Cell therapies explore unmet clinical needs of patients with chronic kidney disease with the potential to alter the pathway toward end-stage kidney disease. We describe the design and baseline patient characteristics of a phase II multicenter clinical trial utilizing the novel renal autologous cell therapy (REACT), by direct kidney parenchymal injection via the percutaneous approach in adults with type 2 diabetic kidney disease (T2DKD), to delay or potentially avoid renal replacement therapy. <b><i>Design:</i></b> The study conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized control, open-label, phase II clinical trial between an active treatment group (ATG) receiving REACT from the beginning of the trial and a contemporaneous deferred treatment group (DTG) receiving standard of care for 12 months before crossing over to receive REACT. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The objective of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of 2 REACT injections with computed tomography guidance, into the renal cortex of patients with T2DKD administered 6 months apart, and to compare the longitudinal change in renal function between the ATG and the DTG. <b><i>Setting:</i></b> This was a multicenter study conducted in major US hospitals. <b><i>Patients:</i></b> We enrolled eighty-three adult patients with T2DKD, who have estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) between 20 and 50 mL/min/1.73 m². <b><i>Methods:</i></b> All patients undergo an image-guided percutaneous kidney biopsy to obtain epithelial phenotype selective renal cells isolated from the kidney tissue that is then expanded ex vivo over 4–6 weeks, resulting in the REACT biologic product. Patients are randomized 1:1 into the ATG or the DTG. Primary efficacy endpoints for both study groups include eGFR measurements at baseline and at 3-month intervals, through 24 months after the last REACT injection. Safety analyses include biopsy-related complications, REACT injection, and cellular-related adverse events. The study utilizes Good Clinical and Manufacturing Practices and a Data and Safety Monitoring Board. The sample size confers a statistical power of 80% to detect an eGFR change in the ATG compared to the DTG at 24 months with an α = 0.05. <b><i>Limitations:</i></b> Blinding cannot occur due to the intent to treat procedure, biopsy in both groups, and open trial design. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This multicenter phase II randomized clinical trial is designed to determine the efficacy and safety of REACT in improving or stabilizing renal function among patients with T2DKD stages 3a–4.

Evaluation of Patient Preference and Perception Regarding the Clinical Use of Autologous Versus Allogeneic Cell Therapy in Orthopedic Surgery

Background: Cell therapy has become a hot topic in orthopedics, with significant research dedicated to improving physicians’ understanding of its efficacy. However, little is known about patients’ cell therapy knowledge. Questions/Purposes: The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate patients’ perceptions of cell therapy in orthopedics, (2) determine whether patients have a preference for autologous or allogeneic cell therapy, and (3) assess patient concerns about cell therapy. Methods: Consecutive outpatients of an orthopedic clinic were surveyed from June 2019 to January 2020. All patients were 18 years old or older and being seen for an orthopedic intervention, including rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, arthroscopic meniscectomy, or a cartilage repair procedure such as an osteochondral allograft transplantation or matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation. Results: A total of 50 patients were surveyed (mean age: 53 years). The patients’ average rating for likelihood to use autologous cells was 8.86 ± 2.2 out of 10 and the average rating for likelihood to use allogeneic cells was 6.24 ± 3.3; 46% of patients had no specific concerns about autologous cell therapy, while 28% expressed concerns about efficacy, and 12% had concerns about donor age. The top 2 “main concerns” about allogeneic cell therapy were disease transmission (30%) and immune reaction (24%). Conclusions: This survey found that patients asserted a preference for autologous cell therapy in orthopedics. Further research is necessary to further elucidate the factors related to cell therapy that are most important to patients.

Main Factors Predicting Nonresponders to Autologous Cell Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia in Patients With Diabetic Foot

Autologous cell therapy (ACT) is a new treatment for patients with no-option critical limb ischemia (NO-CLI). We evaluated the factors involved in the nonresponse to ACT in patients with CLI and diabetic foot. Diabetic patients (n = 72) with NO-CLI treated using ACT in our foot clinic over a period of 8 years were divided into responders (n = 57) and nonresponders (n = 15). Nonresponder was defined as an insufficient increase in transcutaneous oxygen pressure by <5 mm Hg, 3 months after ACT. Patient demographics, diabetes duration and treatment, and comorbidities as well as a cellular response to ACT, limb-related factors, and the presence of inherited thrombotic disorders were compared between the 2 groups. The main independent predictors for an impaired response to ACT were heterozygote Leiden mutation (OR 10.5; 95% CI, 1.72-4) and homozygote methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR 677) mutation (OR 3.36; 95% CI, 1.0-14.3) in stepwise logistic regression. Univariate analysis showed that lower mean protein C levels ( P = .041) were present in nonresponders compared with responders. In conclusion, the significant predictors of an impaired response to ACT in diabetic patients with NO-CLI were inherited thrombotic disorders.