Designing the Ideal Patient Navigation Program for Older Adults with Complex Needs: A Qualitative Exploration of the Preferences of Key Informants

Navigating the healthcare system is complex. Many older adults and their family members report sub-optimal outcomes when transitioning from hospital to home. Patient navigation has been introduced as a model of care to help improve hospital to home transitions and to better integrate care across care environments. There are no best-practice guidelines for designing a patient navigation program for older adults with complex needs. This qualitative descriptive study interviewed 38 healthcare professionals to determine key characteristics of the “ideal” patient navigator program. Thematic analysis revealed four themes describing key components of an ideal patient navigator program for older adults with complex needs: (1) Easy accessibility and open communication amongst staff; (2) flexible eligibility requirements; (3) characteristics of the patient navigator; and (4) appropriate program size and duration. We suggest directions for future research, program design, and implementation considers to improve patient navigation for older adults and their family caregivers.

Implementation factors for patient navigation program success: a qualitative study

Background Patient navigation (PN) is an evidence-based practice that involves assessing and addressing individual barriers to care for patients. While PN has shown effectiveness in numerous studies, designing successful, sustainable PN programs has remained challenging for many healthcare organizations. The purpose of the present study was to examine implementation factors for successful PN programs to optimize the sustainability of PN services across cancer care settings in the USA. Methods Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with PN stakeholders (n=17) from diverse cancer care settings. Thematic content analysis was conducted by deductively coding major themes based on constructs from the Exploration-Preparation-Implementation-Sustainability framework and by inductively coding emergent themes. Results Facilitators in the outer context included payer guidelines, accreditation requirements, community partnerships, and demonstrated need and demand for services. Inner context factors such as alignment with organizational and leadership priorities, appropriate staff support and workloads, and relative advantage were important to program success. Innovation characteristics such as the presence of innovation champions, clear role and scope of practice, clear protocols, strong communication channels, and innovation fit were facilitators of program success. Community-Academic partnerships and funding stability also emerged as facilitators for program sustainability. Conclusion Our qualitative analysis from a diverse sample of PN stakeholders and programs across the USA supports intentional use of implementation theory to design PN programs to optimize implementation success.