The application of C2 transpedicular screw, C1 laminar hook fixation and bone graft in the atlantoaxial instability

Traumatic atlantoaxial instability usually results from a motor vehicle accident, falls and motorcycle accidents. Atlantoaxial instability can lead to spinal cord compression and neck pain, but, spasticity and radicular symptoms as well. The purpose of surgery is to remove the compression and stabilize the joint permanently. To date, several surgical techniques have been described to remedy C1-C2 instability. In this study, the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who operated with the C1 (Atlas bone) laminar hooks fixation and bilateral C2 (Axis bone) trans-pedicular screw technique were shown. Also, the advantages and disadvantages of this technique are discussed. From March 2010 to December 2017, 12 patients who have atlantoaxial instability were surgically treated by modified fixation technique which consists C1 laminar hooks fixation and bilateral C2 transpedicular screw. Twelve patients were operated with this procedure from March 2010 to December 2017. All the patients were checked with flexion-extension x-rays at the end of the twelfth week. The posterior bony fusion formation was observed on imaging in all patients. C2 bilateral pedicle screw combined with C1 laminar hook system is a good method for atlantoaxial instability in the conditions which is not convenient for insertion of C1 lateral mass and C2 trans-articular screw. However, this method may not be available in some cases such as traumatic, infection, neoplastic or degenerative pathologies in which the posterior arch of the atlas is damaged.

C2 Pedicle Screws Combined With C1 Laminar Hooks for Reducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation: An Ideal Salvage Technique for C1-C2 Pedicle Screws

BACKGROUND A C1 laminar hook can theoretically avoid vertebral artery injury and is less technically demanding. However, only few studies with small samples analyzed the short-term outcomes of C2 pedicle screws combined with C1 laminar hooks (C2PS-C1LH) technique in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation. Furthermore, it is not confirmed whether similar clinical outcomes can be achieved with C1-C2 pedicle screw and rod construct (PSRC). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the outcomes of C2PS-C1LH and C1-C2 PSRC fixation techniques for treating atlantoaxial dislocation. METHODS Data of 52 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation treated by C1-C2 PSRC or C2PS-C1LH fixation were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes evaluated by visual analog scale score for neck pain (VASSNP), Neck Disability Index (NDI), atlantodental interval (ADI), and the perioperative parameters including blood loss and operation time were analyzed and compared between 2 techniques. Patient satisfaction at final follow-up was also investigated. RESULTS There were no complications related to the surgical approach and instrumentation in either group. The mean bone fusion time was 5.06 ± 1.65 mo for the C2PS-C1LH group and 3.93 ± 0.99 mo for the C1-C2 PSRC group (P > .05). Hundred percent of fusion rates were achieved in both groups at month 12 after operation. The ADI, VAS scores, the NDI scores, and the JOA scores were greatly improved in both the groups (P < .05), but there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION C2PS-C1LH fixation technique was comparable to C1-C2 PSRC in the treatment of reducible atlantoaxial dislocation. C2PS-C1LH fixation was an ideal alternative strategy to C1-C2 PSRC fixation.