skin eruption
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

231
(FIVE YEARS 35)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherman Chu ◽  
Luisa F. Christensen ◽  
Dennis Vidmar

Dermatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Gabriel Bronz ◽  
Pietro O. Rinoldi ◽  
Camilla Lavagno ◽  
Mario G. Bianchetti ◽  
Sebastiano A.G. Lava ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Acute hemorrhagic edema is a skin-limited small-vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis, which affects infants 4 weeks to 2 years of age and remits within 3 weeks. The diagnosis is made clinically in not-ill appearing children with acute onset of raised annular or nummular eruptions and edema. In this vasculitis, type, distribution, and evolution of the rash have never been systemically investigated. To address this issue, we employed the data contained in the Acute Hemorrhagic Edema Bibliographic Database, which incorporates all reports on acute hemorrhagic edema. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Key features of rash were documented in 383 children. Annular eruptions in a strict sense, usually targetoid, were reported in 375 (98%) cases (many children also presented polycyclic or arciform eruptions). Nummular eruptions were also very common (<i>n</i> = 358; 93%). Purpuric eruptions and ecchymoses were reported in the vast majority of cases. Macules and wheals were described in a minority of cases. Edema, detected in all cases, was mostly painful, indurated and nonpitting. The following regions were affected, in decreasing order, by annular or nummular eruptions: legs, feet, face, arms, ears, trunk, and genitals. With the exception of feet, which were very often affected, the same distribution was reported for edema. The initial eruption was often a wheal or a macule that evolved into a nummular or an annular eruption. Nummular eruptions successively evolved into annular ones. <b><i>Key Message:</i></b> This study carefully characterizes type, distribution, and evolution of skin eruption in acute hemorrhagic edema. The data help physicians to rapidly and noninvasively make the clinical diagnosis of this vasculitis.


Author(s):  
Hikaru Nanamori ◽  
Yu Sawada ◽  
Sayaka Sato ◽  
Yoko Minokawa ◽  
Hitomi Sugino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
Vesri Yossy ◽  
Gardenia Akhyar ◽  
Alimuddin Tofrizal

Introduction: Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (BSLE) is an infrequent but distinct presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in less than 5% of lupus cases. It is characterized by vesicobullous skin eruption in SLE that can develop either before or after SLE diagnosis has been established. Distinguish between BSLE with other autoimmune blistering diseases such as bullous pemphigoid (BP), dermatitis herpetiformis, linear IgA, etc., is very important to prevent misdiagnosis. The physician must be able to combine clinical, histological and immunofluorescence finding for the diagnosis approach. We report a case of blistering skin eruption in SLE patient. Case Report: A 19-year-old female patient complained of tense blistering on her lip, face and wrists since one month ago. She was diagnosed with SLE two weeks ago. The dermatological state showed bullae and vesicle on erythematous/ normal base, erosions, excoriation and blackish red crust on the lip, face, armpit, neck, abdomen and wrists. Histopathological examination of the lesion showed sub-epidermal bullae containing PMN leukocytes consist of abundant neutrophils, only occasional eosinophils and the presence of keratotic plugs. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) of the skin showed linear deposition of IgG, IgA, IgM and C1q at the dermo-epidermal junction. This patient exhibited similar features to both BSLE and BP with tensed clear blisters and subepidermal cleft. BSLE differ from BP by abundant neutrophils found on histopathological examination, whereas BP has abundant eosinophils. Conclusion: Immunofluorescence examination shows linear IgG in BP, whereas linear or granular IgG in BSLE. Establishing the correct diagnosis is important to prevent misdiagnosis and mistreatment.


Author(s):  
E. VANBELLEGHEM ◽  
J. WERBROUCK ◽  
S. VERSTRAETE ◽  
L. LIBBRECHT ◽  
F. D'HEYGERE

Persistent skin eruption in a 52-year-old man losing weight This case report describes a 52-year-old male patient with important weight loss, fatigue, diarrhea and a skin eruption since 1 year. An olmesartan-induced enteropathy and skin vasculitis were diagnosed. There was a total resolution of the symptoms after the interruption of olmesartan. Although sprue-like enteropathy and cutaneous vasculitis are very rare, clinicians should be aware of those potential adverse events, even years after the initiation of an angiotensin II receptor blocker.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Won Yang ◽  
Jong Bin Bae ◽  
Jung-Im Na ◽  
Ki Woong Kim

Abstract Background Lichenoid drug eruption is rare and can mimic idiopathic lichen planus and other dermatoses. Clonazepam, a commonly used drug for the treatment of anxiety-related disorders and seizures, is known to be an unlikely cause of cutaneous adverse effects. Only one case report of LDE due to clonazepam has been reported. Case presentation A 81-year-old male patient with Alzheimer’s disease developed a lichenoid eruption after taking clonazepam. He developed a violaceous scaly patch on his lower extremities, from both buttocks to the feet. The cutaneous eruption resolved 2 months after cessation of clonazepam and with initiation of corticosteroid therapy. Conclusion A skin eruption that develops after clonazepam administration can be a lichenoid drug eruption, which is less likely to resolve spontaneously and requires discontinuation of clonazepam administration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-428
Author(s):  
Joshua K. Hanson ◽  
Julia S. Lehman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document