genomic conservation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

18
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Venkat Bandi ◽  
Carl Gutwin ◽  
Jorge Núñez Siri ◽  
Eric Neufeld ◽  
Andrew Sharpe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (40) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Miyazaki ◽  
Natsuki Tomariguchi ◽  
Yuko Ueno

We isolated four Thermus thermophilus strains from Arima Hot Spring in Japan. Complete genome sequencing revealed that they showed average nucleotide identities of ≥99.21% to each other and to strains previously isolated from the same spot, but of ≤97.86% to strains from geographically different spots in Japan, reflecting habitat-specific genomic conservation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2555-2565
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Sams ◽  
Brett Ford ◽  
Adam Gardner ◽  
Adam R. Boyko

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud M. Al-Bassam ◽  
Julian Haist ◽  
Sara Alina Neumann ◽  
Sandra Lindenberg ◽  
Natalia Tschowri

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Éder C. Lanes ◽  
Nathaniel S. Pope ◽  
Ronnie Alves ◽  
Nelson M. Carvalho Filho ◽  
Tereza C. Giannini ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Desvignes ◽  
H. William Detrich ◽  
John H. Postlethwait

2016 ◽  
Vol 371 (1706) ◽  
pp. 20150528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole Herman Ambur ◽  
Jan Engelstädter ◽  
Pål J. Johnsen ◽  
Eric L. Miller ◽  
Daniel E. Rozen

Many bacteria are highly sexual, but the reasons for their promiscuity remain obscure. Did bacterial sex evolve to maximize diversity and facilitate adaptation in a changing world, or does it instead help to retain the bacterial functions that work right now? In other words, is bacterial sex innovative or conservative? Our aim in this review is to integrate experimental, bioinformatic and theoretical studies to critically evaluate these alternatives, with a main focus on natural genetic transformation, the bacterial equivalent of eukaryotic sexual reproduction. First, we provide a general overview of several hypotheses that have been put forward to explain the evolution of transformation. Next, we synthesize a large body of evidence highlighting the numerous passive and active barriers to transformation that have evolved to protect bacteria from foreign DNA, thereby increasing the likelihood that transformation takes place among clonemates. Our critical review of the existing literature provides support for the view that bacterial transformation is maintained as a means of genomic conservation that provides direct benefits to both individual bacterial cells and to transformable bacterial populations. We examine the generality of this view across bacteria and contrast this explanation with the different evolutionary roles proposed to maintain sex in eukaryotes.  This article is part of the themed issue ‘Weird sex: the underappreciated diversity of sexual reproduction’.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole Herman Ambur ◽  
Jan Engelstädter ◽  
Pål J. Johnsen ◽  
Eric L. Miller ◽  
Daniel E. Rozen

SummaryMany bacteria are highly sexual, but the reasons for their promiscuity remain obscure. Did bacterial sex evolve to maximize diversity and facilitate adaptation in a changing world, or does it instead help to retain the bacterial functions that work right now? In other words, is bacterial sex innovative or conservative? Our aim in this review is to integrate experimental, bioinformatic and theoretical studies to critically evaluate these alternatives, with a main focus on natural genetic transformation, the bacterial equivalent of eukaryotic sexual reproduction. First, we provide a general overview of several hypotheses that have been put forward to explain the evolution of transformation. Next, we synthesize a large body of evidence highlighting the numerous passive and active barriers to transformation that have evolved to protect bacteria from foreign DNA, thereby increasing the likelihood that transformation takes place among clonemates. Our critical review of the existing literature provides support for the view that bacterial transformation is maintained as a means of genomic conservation that provides direct benefits to both individual bacterial cells and to transformable bacterial populations. We examine the generality of this view across bacteria and contrast this explanation with the different evolutionary roles proposed to maintain sex in eukaryotes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document