cephalopod evolution
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

12
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2017 ◽  
Vol 284 (1850) ◽  
pp. 20162818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alastair R. Tanner ◽  
Dirk Fuchs ◽  
Inger E. Winkelmann ◽  
M. Thomas P. Gilbert ◽  
M. Sabrina Pankey ◽  
...  

Coleoid cephalopod molluscs comprise squid, cuttlefish and octopuses, and represent nearly the entire diversity of modern cephalopods. Sophisticated adaptations such as the use of colour for camouflage and communication, jet propulsion and the ink sac highlight the unique nature of the group. Despite these striking adaptations, there are clear parallels in ecology between coleoids and bony fishes. The coleoid fossil record is limited, however, hindering confident analysis of the tempo and pattern of their evolution. Here we use a molecular dataset (180 genes, approx. 36 000 amino acids) of 26 cephalopod species to explore the phylogeny and timing of cephalopod evolution. We show that crown cephalopods diverged in the Silurian–Devonian, while crown coleoids had origins in the latest Palaeozoic. While the deep-sea vampire squid and dumbo octopuses have ancient origins extending to the Early Mesozoic Era, 242 ± 38 Ma, incirrate octopuses and the decabrachian coleoids (10-armed squid) diversified in the Jurassic Period. These divergence estimates highlight the modern diversity of coleoid cephalopods emerging in the Mesozoic Marine Revolution, a period that also witnessed the radiation of most ray-finned fish groups in addition to several other marine vertebrates. This suggests that that the origin of modern cephalopod biodiversity was contingent on ecological competition with marine vertebrates.


2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (21-24) ◽  
pp. 1373-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Louise Allcock ◽  
A. Lindgren ◽  
J.M. Strugnell

Paleobiology ◽  
10.1666/12029 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin R. Smith

Nectocaridids are soft-bodied early to middle Cambrian organisms known from Burgess Shale-type deposits in Canada, China, and Australia. Originally described as unrelated species, they have recently been interpreted as a clade; their flexible tentacles, camera-type eyes, lateral fins, internal gills, axial cavity, and funnel point to a relationship with the cephalopods. However, aspects of this reinterpretation, including the relevance of the group to cephalopod evolution, have been called into question.Here, I examine new and existing nectocaridid material, including a large new form that may represent a sexual dimorph of Nectocaris pteryx. Differences between existing taxa largely represent taphonomic variation between sites and specimens—which provides further constraint on the organisms' anatomy. I revise the morphology of the tentacles and fins, and describe mouthparts and phosphatized gills for the first time. A mathematical analysis supports the presence of the earliest known camera-type eyes, and fluid mechanical considerations suggest that the funnel is optimized for efficient jet propulsion in a low Reynolds number flow regime.Nectocaridids closely resemble coleoid cephalopods, but a position deeper within Cephalopoda raises fewer stratigraphic challenges. Whether its coleoid-like construction reflects common ancestry or profound convergence, the Nectocaris body plan adds substantially to Cambrian disparity, demonstrating the rapid colonization of nektobenthic niches after the Cambrian explosion.


Lethaia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARTIN R. SMITH ◽  
JEAN-BERNARD CARON
Keyword(s):  

Palaeontology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1327-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
HARRY MUTVEI ◽  
YUN-BAI ZHANG ◽  
ELENA DUNCA

2003 ◽  
Vol 83 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 39-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Kröger
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 806-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Chamberlain Jr.

Like its coleoid relatives, Nautilus swims by jet propulsion. However, in the structure and functioning of its motor, Nautilus differs markedly from its contemporaries. Compared with that of squids, Nautilus locomotion is based on small propellant volume, low mantle cavity pressure, low propellant velocity, and small propulsive muscle mass. Propulsive performance of Nautilus is consequently unspectacular, with as little as one-eighth the thrust and one-tenth the burst speed observed in squids of equivalent size. Nautilus survives as a result of its slow-moving, vertically mobile, foraging life-style limited to habitats where competition with fast-moving, agile swimmers is minimal. Fossil cephalopods faced similar design constraints, which may have contributed to their decline, but nonbiologic factors such as sea level fluctuations may also have been important in directing the course of cephalopod evolution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document