Agitation Techniques to Enhance Drainage of Retained Hemothorax

Background. Retained hemothorax (RH) is a common problem in cardiothoracic and trauma surgery. We aimed to determine the optimum agitation technique to enhance thrombus dissolution and drainage and to apply the technique to a porcine-retained hemothorax. Methods. Three agitation techniques were tested: flush irrigation, ultrasound, and vibration. We used the techniques in a benchtop model with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and pig hemothorax with tPA. We used the most promising technique vibration in a pig hemothorax without tPA. Statistics. We used 2-sample t tests for each comparison and Cohen d tests to calculate effect size (ES). Results. In the benchtop model, mean drainages in the agitation group and control group and the ES were flush irrigation, 42%, 28%, and 2.91 ( P = .10); ultrasound, 35%, 27%, and .76 ( P = .30); and vibration, 28%, 19%, and 1.14 ( P = .04). In the pig hemothorax with tPA, mean drainages and the ES of each agitation technique compared with control (58%) were flush irrigation, 80% and 1.14 ( P = .37); ultrasound, 80% and 2.11 ( P = .17); and vibration, 95% and 3.98 ( P = .06). In the pig hemothorax model without tPA, mean drainages of the vibration technique and control group were 50% and 43% (ES = .29; P = .65). Discussion. In vitro studies suggested flush irrigation had the greatest effect, whereas only vibration was significantly different vs the respective controls. In vivo with tPA, vibration showed promising but not statistically significant results. Results of in vivo experiments without tPA were negative. Conclusion. Agitation techniques, in combination with tPA, may enhance drainage of hemothorax.

A bedside rescue method for retrieving retained guidewires: The ‘Suck Out’ technique

Background: Central venous catheter guidewire retention is classed as a ‘never event’ in the United Kingdom, with the potential for significant patient harm. If the retained guidewire remains within the central venous catheter lumen, bedside techniques may facilitate guidewire retrieval. However, these techniques may be ineffective if the guidewire has already passed below skin level. We investigated a novel ‘suck out’ technique for bedside guidewire retrieval and compared this against traditional retrieval methods. Methods: Simulation 1: in a benchtop model, seven different central venous catheters had their corresponding guidewire placed in the last 2 cm of the catheter tip which was immersed horizontally in fluid. A 50-mL syringe was attached to the distal lumen central venous catheter hub and suction applied for 5 s, and the distance of guidewire retraction was recorded. Simulation 2: a central venous catheter guidewire was intentionally retained within the catheter at either 5 cm above or below skin level in a pigskin model. Simple catheter withdrawal, catheter clamping withdrawal and the ‘suck out’ method were compared for efficacy using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Simulation 1: retained guidewires were retracted by 13 cm on average. Simulation 2: when guidewires were retained 5 cm above skin level, all retrieval methods were 100% effective; however, when retained 5 cm below skin level, simple catheter withdrawal was ineffective, clamping and withdrawal was only 10% effective and the ‘suck out’ technique was 90% effective (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The ‘suck out’ technique can effectively retract guidewires retained within central venous catheter lumens and demonstrates superiority over traditional methods of retained guidewire extraction in simulated models.