Generalized Propensity Score Matching with Multilevel Treatment Options

Background: Although conventional form of propensity score matching (PSM) is widely used in outcomes research field, its application on multilevel treatment is limited.</p> Objectives: This article reviews PSM and illustrates their use when there are more than two treatment choices, which is very common in health services research. Methods: Generalized PSM technique was applied to commercial claims data to estimate the treatment effect of reliever only, controller only and combination therapy of patients with asthma. The propensity score is estimated using multinomial logistic regression. The outcome variable was total annual health care costs. Inverse probability weighting was applied to calculate risk adjusted costs. Results are compared with multivariate regression analysis, where the generalized linear model is used with gamma family and log link function. Results: Based on the study’s definitions of an asthma episode, we obtained a sample that included 25,124 patients in fee-for-service (FFS) plans and 6,603 patients in non-FFS plans. Under each plan type, patients who were prescribed three different treatment options were significantly different in terms of their demographic and clinical characteristics. Compared to combination therapy under FFS group, the difference of the total health care costs among reliever therapy and controller only group was significant ($728 and $1,216, respectively). Under non-FFS group, reliever only therapy totaled $1,266; controller only therapy was $1,959, and combination therapy totaled $1,933. Although the cost difference between reliever only and combination therapy was significant, there was no evidence that combination therapy cost more than controller only therapy. There were no significant differences in the multi-level propensity score adjusted results and multivariate regression results. Conclusion: This analysis presents the potential value of generalized PSM methods in health services when there are multilevel treatment options.

Thirteen Years of Hyoid Suspension Experience in Multilevel OSAHS Surgery: The Short-Term Results of a Bicentric Study

Aims. To evaluate thirteen years of hyoid suspension experience in multilevel OSAHS surgery, for which hyoidthyroidpexia represented the exclusive hypopharyngeal approach applied.Materials and Methods. From 1998 to 2011, a bicentric retrospective study was conducted: all adult patients with a diagnosis of OSAHS were enrolled. Specific eligible criteria were established. Pre-/postoperative data concerning ENT and sleep findings were recorded. Recruited subjects were surveilled for a follow-up range from 6 to 18 months.Results. A total of 590 hyoid suspensions were evaluated, but only 140 patients met the specific inclusion criteria. A success rate of 67% was obtained. No intraoperative adverse events or major complications occurred. Excessive daytime sleepiness was observed in 28% of nonresponders. Despite the homogeneous candidate anatomy, ENT awake findings changed differently after surgery. Statistical analysis revealed multilevel surgery to be more effective when AHI < 30. Postoperative AHI was statistically not influenced by preoperative BMI.Conclusions. Hyoid suspension in multilevel treatment is effective when short-term results are considered. The necessity of a more valuable anatomic-based diagnostic approach is crucial to guide the patient selection. Long-term followups and randomized prospective trials with case-control series are needed to increase the level of evidence of this surgery.