Endocarditis following an unsuccessful attempt to remove a gastric GI stromal tumor by laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) are the most common subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. Treatment of lesions greater than 2 cm in diameter is by laparoscopic wedge resection. We report a 77-year-old man who was diagnosed with a 2.3 cm diameter gastric GIST. He had a thickened mitral valve, severe mitral annular calcification, mild mitral regurgitation and moderate aortic stenosis. One week after undergoing an unsuccessful attempt at Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery (LECS), he was admitted with a fever of 40.2o C. Blood cultures grew Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography revealed moderate mitral regurgitation and an 8 X 5 mm vegetation on the mitral valve and posterior annulus. This is the first report of endocarditis following LECS. Physicians need to be aware of this possible complication. Keywords: endocarditis; GI stromal tumor; endocarditis; endoscopic tumor.

Primary gastric synovial sarcoma resected by laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery of the stomach: a case report

Background Primary gastric synovial sarcoma is extremely rare, only 44 cases have been reported so far, and there have been no reports of laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery for this condition. Case presentation A 45-year-old male patient presented with gastric pain. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed that led to the identification of an 8-mm submucosal tumor in the anterior wall of the antrum, and a kit-negative gastrointestinal stromal tumor was suspected following biopsy. On endoscopic ultrasonography, the boundary of the tumor, mainly composed of the second layer, was depicted as a slightly unclear low-echo region, and a pointless no echo region was scattered inside. A boring biopsy revealed synovial sarcoma. Positron emission tomography did not reveal fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) accumulation in the stomach or other organs. Thus, the patient was diagnosed with a primary gastric synovial sarcoma, and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery was performed. The tumor of the antrum could not be confirmed laparoscopically from the serosa, and under intraoperative endoscopy, it had delle on the mucosal surface, which was removed by a method that does not involve releasing the gastric wall. Immunohistochemistry showed that the spindle cells were positive for EMA, BCL-2 protein, TLE-1, and SS18-SSX fusion-specific antibodies but negative for KIT and DOG-1. The final pathological diagnosis was synovial sarcoma of the stomach. The postoperative course was good, and the patient was discharged from the hospital on the 11th postoperative day. Conclusion Resection with laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), which has not been reported before, was effective for small synovial sarcomas that could not be confirmed laparoscopically. With the combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with a non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET) procedure, it was possible to excise the tumor with the minimum excision range of the gastric serosa without opening the stomach.

Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials

Recently, nonexposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection (NESS-EFTR) method was developed to avoid tumor exposure to the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this study is to compare the short-term outcomes of the NESS-EFTR method with those of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). A prospective single-center trial of LECS for gastric SETs was performed from March 2012 to October 2013 with a separate prospective trial of NESS-EFTR performed from August 2015 to June 2017, enrolling 15 patients each. Among the 30 enrolled patients, 14 who underwent LECS and 11 who underwent NESS-EFTR were finally included in the analysis. The rate of complete resection and successful closure was 100% in both groups. The operating time was longer for NESS-EFTR group than for LECS (110 vs. 189 min; p < 0.0001). There were no postoperative complications except one case of transient fever in the NESS-EFTR group. One patient in the LECS group had peritoneal seeding of gastrointestinal stromal tumor at 17 months postoperatively, and there was no other recurrence. Although NESS-EFTR had long operating and procedure times, it was feasible for patients with gastric SETs requiring a nonexposure technique.

A137 LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC COOPERATIVE SURGERY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOURS: EARLY EXPERIENCE IN A CANADIAN ACADEMIC CENTRE

Background Surgical resection with laparoscopic gastric wedge resection is commonly conducted for local management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). However, resection margins are often difficult to appreciate for lesions with larger endophytic components. As a result, tumour margins may be compromised or excess tissue resected. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) was developed in Japan to overcome these technical challenges in the resection of subepithelial lesions, including GISTs. Here, we present a case report of an early Canadian experience utilizing LECS in the management of gastric GIST. Aims To describe a case report of an early Canadian experience of LECS for the resection of a gastric GIST. Methods We performed a review of the literature and describe a case of LECS. Results We present a 70-year-old female referred to our centre for endoscopic resection of a 2.5x2.5cm histologically confirmed gastric GIST (low mitotic index and no known metastases). Repeat endoscopic evaluation at our centre confirmed a 25-30mm subepithelial lesion with both exophytic (small) and endophytic (large) components. After tumour board review, we opted for a LECS approach. In the OR, the lesion was identified endoscopically and marked with a Dual J-Knife (Olympus). The margins were injected with a combination of Voluven, methylene blue, and dilute epinephrine. A circumferential incision was then completed using standard ESD technique. The lesion was subsequently identified laparoscopically, with endoscopic guidance, along the lesser curvature. The lesser omentum was mobilized for clear visualization of the serosa around the lesion. A full thickness incision was made endoscopically along the distal aspect of lesion. Full thickness resection was continued endoscopically for one third of the circumference of the lesion until gastric insufflation became compromised. Full thickness resection was completed laparoscopically under endoscopic guidance with grossly negative margins. The defect was closed with running laparoscopic sutures. Endoscopic leak test was performed which was negative. The specimen was retrieved and follow up pathology demonstrated a GIST with low mitotic index and negative margins without tumour rupture. Conclusions In a review of the literature, LECS appears to minimize tissue resection while maintaining R0 resection rates. This technique is especially useful for subepithelial lesions with larger endophytic and transmural components. It has an excellent safety profile with a less than 5% anastomotic leak rate. As such, the literature supports LECS as a suitable procedure for gastric subepithelial lesions &lt;50 mm. However, further studies are needed to compare it systematically to conventional laparoscopic wedge resection in addition to other innovative endoscopic techniques such as STER and EFTR. Funding Agencies None