error formulas
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

40
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Qing-Guo Wang ◽  
Tao Liu ◽  
Zhuo-Yun Nie ◽  
Shoulin Hao ◽  
Xuhui Ren ◽  
...  

This paper addresses the control of a continuous-time system with possibly large uncertainty of unknown internal dynamics or external disturbance. A novel control scheme is proposed to estimate and cancel the system uncertainty effectively so as to enhance disturbance rejection (DR) performance. Unlike asymptotic analysis with infinite gain in the literature, the estimation transient analysis is carried out for the proposed scheme with a finite estimator gain and the precise error formulas are derived, based on a classical low-order plant description. The control performance associated with a realizable gain is quantified by tight bounds with respect to the ideal case, which enables easy parameter tuning. The necessary and sufficient condition for the internal stability of the control system is established, along with a D-decomposition method for determining the complete set of the gain intervals that could internally stabilize the plant. In the presence of measurement noise, a low-pass filter is introduced to attenuate its adverse effect. Simulations and semi-realistic experiments are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme, which shows evident improvement on DR performance over the well-known active DR control.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24
Author(s):  
Yasuhito Narita ◽  
Ferdinand Plaschke ◽  
Werner Magnes ◽  
David Fischer ◽  
Daniel Schmid

Abstract. Fluxgate magnetometers are widely used for in situ magnetic field measurements in the context of geophysical and solar system studies. Like in most experimental studies, magnetic field measurements using the fluxgate magnetometers are constrained by the associated uncertainties. To evaluate the performance of magnetometers, the measurement uncertainties of calibrated magnetic field data are quantitatively studied for a spinning spacecraft. The uncertainties are derived analytically by perturbing the calibration parameters and are simplified into the first-order expression including the offset errors and the coupling of calibration parameter errors with the ambient magnetic field. The error study shows how the uncertainty sources combine through the calibration process. The final error depends on (1) the magnitude of the magnetic field with respect to the offset error and (2) the angle of the magnetic field to the spacecraft spin axis. The offset uncertainties are the major factor in a low-field environment, while the angle uncertainties (rotation angle in the spin plane, sensor non-orthogonality, and sensor misalignment to the spacecraft reference directions) become more important in a high-field environment in a proportional way to the magnetic field. The error formulas serve as a useful tool in designing high-precision magnetometers in future spacecraft missions as well as in data analysis methods in geophysical and solar system science.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhito Narita ◽  
Ferdinand Plaschke ◽  
Werner Magnes ◽  
David Fischer ◽  
Daniel Schmid

Abstract. Fluxgate magnetometers are widely used for in-situ magnetic field measurements in the context of geophysical and solar system studies. Like in most of experimental studies, magnetic field measurements using the fluxgate magnetometers are constrained to the associated uncertainties. To evaluate the performance of magnetometers, the measurement uncertainties of calibrated magnetic field data are quantitatively studied for a spinning spacecraft. The uncertainties are derived analytically by perturbing the calibration procedure, and are simplified into the first-order expression including the offset errors and the coupling of calibration parameter errors with the ambient magnetic field. The error study shows how the uncertainty sources combine through the calibration process. The final error depends on the ambient environment such as the magnitude of magnetic field relative to the offset error and the angle of magnetic field to the spacecraft spin axis are important factors. The offset uncertainties are the major factor in a low-field environment, while the angle uncertainties (rotation angle in the spin plane, sensor non-orthogonality, and sensor misalignment to the spacecraft reference directions) become more important in a high-field environment in a proportional way to the magnetic field. The error formulas serve as a useful tool in designing high-precision magnetometers in future spacecraft missions as well as in data analysis methods in geophysical and solar system science.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-47
Author(s):  
Han Hong ◽  
Michael P Leung ◽  
Jessie Li

Summary This paper studies inference on finite-population average and local average treatment effects under limited overlap, meaning that some strata have a small proportion of treated or untreated units. We model limited overlap in an asymptotic framework, sending the propensity score to zero (or one) with the sample size. We derive the asymptotic distribution of analogue estimators of the treatment effects under two common randomization schemes: conditionally independent and stratified block randomization. Under either scheme, the limit distribution is the same and conventional standard error formulas remain asymptotically valid, but the rate of convergence is slower the faster the propensity score degenerates. The practical import of these results is two-fold. When overlap is limited, standard methods can perform poorly in smaller samples, as asymptotic approximations are inadequate owing to the slower rate of convergence. However, in larger samples, standard methods can work quite well even when the propensity score is small.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 1090-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe Li ◽  
Shugong Zhang ◽  
Tian Dong ◽  
Yihe Gong
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Guoqiang Fu ◽  
Jianzhong Fu ◽  
Hongyao Shen ◽  
Xinhua Yao

This paper proposes a tool following function-based identification approach (TFFIA) for geometric errors of two rotary axes for one five-axis machine tool. It is comprehensive to identify all geometric errors of rotary errors. Firstly, synthetic error formulas of ballbar originate from the geometric error model of machine tools in order to consider the influences of 21 errors of three translational axes. It makes the approach more reasonable and precise. Secondly, the structures of three measurement patterns of TFFIA are described. Thirdly, in each pattern, errors of rotary axes affecting the accuracy of the sensitive direction are identified. As the result, the identification equations of all 20 errors coincide with the geometric properties of errors. Moreover, the impacts of setup errors of ballbar are eliminated with least square method to improve the precise of TFFIA. According to the structures of three patterns, only three installation of workpiece ball of ballbar are needed in the whole identification of two rotary axes to obtain the required ballbar readings. It greatly shortens the measurement time. Twenty geometric errors of two rotary axes are calculated with identification equations and ballbar readings. Finally, TFFIA is applied to a SmartCNC500 five-axis vertical machining center. The corresponding comparisons are proposed to verify the effectiveness and accuracy of TFFIA.


2016 ◽  
Vol 148 (2) ◽  
pp. 466-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. H. Gong ◽  
X. Jiang ◽  
Z. Li ◽  
S. G. Zhang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document