coastal dune ecosystem
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

18
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
Zach Hilgendorf ◽  
M. Colin Marvin ◽  
Craig M. Turner ◽  
Ian J. Walker

Uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) provide an effective method to examine geomorphic and vegetation change in restored coastal dune ecosystems. Coupling structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry with RGB orthomosaic imagery allows researchers to characterize spatial-temporal geomorphic responses associated with differences in vegetation cover. Such approaches provide quantitative data on landscape morphodynamics and sediment erosion and deposition responses that allow scientists and land managers to assess the efficacy of dynamic restoration efforts and, in turn, make informed decisions for future restoration projects. Two different restored coastal foredune sites in Humboldt County, California were monitored between 2016–20 with UAS (quadcopter and fixed-wing), kite aerial photogrammetry (KAP), and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) platforms. We compared our KAP- and UAS-SfM elevation models to concurrently collected TLS bare earth models for five of our fifteen collections. The goal of this study was to inform on the potential of a multi-platform aerial approach for calculating geomorphic differences (i.e., topographic differencing), in order to quantify sediment erosion and deposition, and vegetation change over a coastal dune ecosystem. While UAS-SfM datasets were relatively well fit to their TLS counterparts (2.1–12.2% area of difference), the KAP-SfM surfaces exhibited higher deviations (23.6–27.6%) and suffered from systematic collection inconsistencies related to methods and susceptibility to external factors (e.g., the influence of wind speed and direction on variable altitude, image overlap, and coverage extent). Finally, we provide commentary on the logistical considerations regarding KAP and UAS data collection and the construction of uncertainty budgets for geomorphic change detection (GCD), while providing suggestions for standardizing methods for uncertainty budgeting. While we propose an approach that incorporates multiple levels of collection- and processing-based uncertainty, we also recognize that uncertainty is often project-specific and outline the development of potential standards for incorporating uncertainty budgets in SfM projects.



2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabella Medina Machín ◽  
Javier Marcello ◽  
Antonio I. Hernández-Cordero ◽  
Javier Martín Abasolo ◽  
Francisco Eugenio


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-60
Author(s):  
Yasutaka Nakata ◽  
Hajime Matsushima ◽  
Yoshihiko Hirabuki ◽  
Dai Nagamatsu ◽  
Kohei Oka ◽  
...  






2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (Pt_12) ◽  
pp. 4474-4478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa F. D. Freitas ◽  
Raquel Barbosa ◽  
José Paulo Sampaio ◽  
Marc-André Lachance ◽  
Carlos A. Rosa

Two strains of a novel cactophilic yeast species were isolated from the columnar cactus Pilosocereus arrabidae in a sand dune ecosystem in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Phylogenetic analysis of sequences of the large subunit rRNA gene D1/D2 domains showed that the strains represent a sister species to Starmera caribaea, from which it differs by 21 nt substitutions and two indels. The novel species is heterothallic and the asci are deliquescent with the formation of two to four hat-shaped ascospores. The name Starmera pilosocereana sp. nov. is proposed for the species. The type strain is UFMG-CM-Y316T ( = CBS 13266T) and the allotype is UFMG-CM-Y346a ( = CBS 13265). The Mycobank number is MB 810683. In addition, Candida stellimalicola belonging to the Starmera clade, is reassigned to Starmera as a new combination.



PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e0117903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Johnson ◽  
Yesenia L. De León


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felícia M. Fischer ◽  
Juliano M. Oliveira ◽  
André L.P. Dresseno ◽  
Valério D. Pillar


Geomorphology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 199 ◽  
pp. 192-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian J. Walker ◽  
Jordan B.R. Eamer ◽  
Ian B. Darke


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document