breeding suppression
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1003-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Dulude‐de Broin ◽  
Sandra Hamel ◽  
Gabriela F. Mastromonaco ◽  
Steeve D. Côté

2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 281-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Jochym ◽  
S. Halle

Research on mammals and birds has shown that predation may have indirect effects on prey reproduction. Some of the indirect effects may give prey an adaptive advantage. Females of several vole species respond to the presence of predators from the genus Mustela L., 1758 with suppressed breeding; this response increases females’ chances of survival. However, breeding suppression is observed only in a certain part of the female population; it is unclear whether predation risk affects the remaining females. We investigated this in a capture–mark–recapture experiment on reproductive effort of female common voles (Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1778)) facing simulated presence of mustelid predators. We measured two parameters: the number of recruits per litter and the litter interval. Compared with control populations, the number of recruits per litter was not affected, but the litter interval was longer in females facing mustelid risk of predation. This indicates that predation risk affects females in a more complex way than originally proposed: it induces breeding suppression in some, but also influences litter frequency in others. Our result suggests that predatory stress deregulates the estrous cycle. Decreased frequency of litters can be a viable antipredatory adaptation in iteroparous organisms.


Ecology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 252-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Kokko ◽  
Graeme D. Ruxton

Ecology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Kokko ◽  
Graeme D. Ruxton

Oikos ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tapio Mappes ◽  
Esa Koskela ◽  
Hannu Ylönen ◽  
Hannu Ylonen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document