1675 ABCDE vasodilator stress echocardiography in non-ischemic heart failure

OnBehalf Stress Echo 2020 study group of the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging Background ABCDE-stress echocardiography (SE) may explore different aspects in the heterogeneous entity of known or suspected heart failure (HF). Aim To assess ABCDE-vasodilator SE in non-ischemic HF Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we recruited 428 patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries: 148 patients with HF and preserved (>50%) ejection fraction (HFpEF, Group 1); 100 with HF and mid-range (40-50%) ejection fraction (HFmrEF, Group 2); 180 with HF and reduced (<40%) ejection fraction (HFrEF, Group 3). A group of 75 healthy asymptomatic patients (30 male, 40%, age 57 ± 14 years) referred to testing for screening was also selected (Controls). All patients underwent vasodilator SE with dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg) in 14 accredited laboratories of 5 countries (Argentina, Brasil, Russian Federation, Serbia and Italy). The ABCDE-SE protocol was adopted: A for regional wall motion abnormalities; B for B-lines (positivity criterion: stress ≥ rest for ≥ 2 points in a 4-site simplified scan available in 181 pts and 10 controls); C for left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR) based on force (systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume, positivity criterion: peak/ rest ≤1.1); D for pulsed wave Doppler-based assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in left anterior descending coronary artery (positivity criterion: peak/rest ≤2.0); E for EKG-based assessment of heart rate reserve (positivity criterion: peak/rest ≤1.22). Results All positivity criteria, except A, were more prevalent (p<.01) in Group 3 compared to Group 2, in Group 2 compared to Group 1, and Group 1 compared to controls: see figure. In particular, a blunted heart rate reserve was found in 4/75 controls (5%), 27/148 pts of Group 1 (18%), 28/100 of Group 2 (28%) and 98/180 of Group 3 (54%). Conclusions ABCDE-vasodilator SE can help to identify the profound pathophysiological heterogeneity underlying a similar clinical presentation in patients with known or suspected HF with angiographically normal coronary arteries. These patients rarely show stress-induced regional wall motion abnormalities (A), but may exhibit pulmonary congestion (B), reduced myocardial functional reserve (C), altered coronary microcirculation (D) and cardiac autonomic dysfunction (E). Abstract 1675 Figure. The positivity rate of ABCDE criteria

P4986Quadruple imaging exercise stress echocardiography in unexplained dyspnoea

Background Current guidelines recommend the use of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in patients with unexplained dyspnoea. The methodological standard of ESE was recently reshaped with the quadruple imaging protocol, mainly tested in patients with chest pain. Aim of this study was to define the ESE pattern of response in patients with dyspnoea as the main symptom Methods From the initial population on a 1-year cohort of 604 patients referred in a single center for clinically-driven semi-supine ESE, we selected a subset of 93 consecutive patients (age 63±9 years, 52 females, resting Ejection fraction = 64±7%) with exertional dyspnea (shortness of breath, exertional fatigue or poor exercise capacity). All underwent quadruple imaging ESE: 1- Regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA, step A) assessment (with wall motion score index, WMSI); 2- B-lines (step B) with simplified 4-site scan, each space scored from 0 = black, to 10= white (positivity criterion: stress score > rest for at least 2 points); 3- Left ventricle contractile reserve (LVCR, step C) assessment with stress/rest ratio of LV force measured as systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume (positivity criterion:<2.0); 4- Pulsed-wave Doppler coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR, step D) assessment in mid-distal LAD (positivity criterion: stress/rest diastolic peak flow velocity <2.0). Readers were accredited for each parameter upstream to recruitment via a web-based system. Results Feasibility was 100% for steps A, B and C, and 82% for step D. RWMA were present in 56 patients (60%). Of them, 27 underwent coronary angiography verification, showing significant coronary artery disease in 81%. B-lines positivity occurred in 35 patients (38%), an abnormal LVCR in 63 patients (68%), and a reduced CFVR in 44 pts (55%). At least one positivity criterion was observed in 80 patients (86%). Conclusions Patients with unexplained dyspnea are a reason of referral to ESE, accounting for 15% of contemporary testing. Quadruple imaging is useful to document the origin of dyspnoea as an ischemic equivalent (A positivity) and/or its cardiogenic origin for acute backward failure with pulmonary congestion (B positivity), myocardial function abnormalities (C positivity), and reduction of CFVR of microvascular-epicardial-myocardial origin (D positivity). Dyspnoea of unexplained origin is a multifactorial problem, and a more comprehensive assessment of these patients during ESE expands the clinical potential of the method.

Schur-Positivity in a Square

Determining if a symmetric function is Schur-positive is a prevalent and, in general, a notoriously difficult problem. In this paper we study the Schur-positivity of a family of symmetric functions. Given a partition $\nu$, we denote by $\nu^c$ its complement in a square partition $(m^m)$. We conjecture a Schur-positivity criterion for symmetric functions of the form $s_{\mu'}s_{\mu^c}-s_{\nu'}s_{\nu^c}$, where $\nu$ is a partition of weight $|\mu|-1$ contained in $\mu$ and the complement of $\mu$ is taken in the same square partition as the complement of $\nu$. We prove the conjecture in many cases.