quantitative uptake
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (06) ◽  
pp. 403-410
Author(s):  
Michael Thomas Beck ◽  
Gregor Rugel ◽  
Julia Reinfelder ◽  
Torsten Kuwert ◽  
Philipp Ritt ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim Our goal was to assess visual and quantitative aspects of multimodal skeletal SPECT/CT reconstructions (recon) in differentiating necrotic and healthy bone of patients with suspected MRONJ. Methods Prior to surgery, 20 patients with suspected MRONJ underwent SPECT/CT of the jaw 3–4 hours after injection of Tc-99m-DPD (622±112.4 MBq). SPECT/CT data were reconstructed using the multimodal xSPECT Bone and xSPECT Quant algorithms as well as the OSEM-algorithm FLASH 3D. For analysis, we divided the jaw into 12 separate regions. Both xSPECT Bone and FLASH 3D datasets were scored on a four-point scale (VIS xSPECT; VIS F3D), based on the intensity of localized tracer uptake. In F3D and xSPECT Quant datasets, local tracer uptake of each region was recorded as semi-quantitative uptake ratio (SQR F3D) or SUVs, respectively. ROC analysis was performed. Postoperative histologic results served as gold standard. Results VIS F3D, VIS xSPECT and SQR F3D did not differ significantly in diagnostic accuracy (VIS xSPECT sensitivity=0.64; specificity=0.89). Of the quantitative parameters, SUVpeak yielded the best interobserver reproducibility. SUVpeak was 9.9±7.1 (95%CI: 7.84–11.95) in MRONJ regions, as opposed 3.6±1.8 (95% CI:3.36–3.88) elsewhere, with a cutpoint of 4.5 (sensitivity=0.83; specificity=0.80). Absolute quantitation significantly surpassed VIS and SQR (p<0.05) in accuracy and interobserver agreement (SUVpeak: κ=0.92; VIS xSPECT: κ=0.61; SQR F3D κ=0.66). Conclusion Absolute quantitation proved significantly more accurate than visual and semi-quantitative assessment in diagnosing MRONJ, with higher interobserver agreement.



Author(s):  
Pachara Thonglim ◽  
Chanisa Chotipanich ◽  
Prathan Buranasiri ◽  
Chanidapa Iamsa-art ◽  
Attapon Jantarato


2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 600-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingzan Zhuang ◽  
David Vállez García ◽  
Gerbrand M. Kramer ◽  
Virginie Frings ◽  
E.F. Smit ◽  
...  




2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. S19
Author(s):  
Lyndon Jones ◽  
Negar Babaei Omali ◽  
Miriam Heynen ◽  
Chantal Coles-Brennan ◽  
Zohra Fadli ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 1272-1273
Author(s):  
Eric Laffon ◽  
Henri de Clermont ◽  
Sébastien Buj ◽  
Roger Marthan
Keyword(s):  


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 1274-1275
Author(s):  
G. M. Kramer ◽  
O. S. Hoekstra ◽  
R. Boellaard
Keyword(s):  


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 902-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Leynes ◽  
Jaewon Yang ◽  
Dattesh D. Shanbhag ◽  
Sandeep S. Kaushik ◽  
Youngho Seo ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
Vol 568 ◽  
pp. 819-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neus Feliu ◽  
Jonas Hühn ◽  
Mikhail V. Zyuzin ◽  
Sumaira Ashraf ◽  
Daniel Valdeperez ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document