sac syringing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

4
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-227
Author(s):  
Bipin Kishore Prasad ◽  
Krishna Kamal Ghosh

Introduction   Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy aims to establish a patent nasolacrimal fistula. Use of silicone stent is a preferred modification to achieve long term patency of neo-ostium, though it has been blamed for granulations, synechia and punctal erosion. Present study was done to  evaluate and compare the outcomes of Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stent.  Materials and Methods 40 patients of with chronic dacryocystitis and nasolacrimal duct blockage were selected for the study. Nasal endoscopy was done for suitability of surgical access and to detect any nasal pathology. Sac syringing was done to assess the site of blockage and Dacryoscintigraphy to confirm it. 20 patients in Group A underwent Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without stent and remaining 20 in Group B with silicone stent. Success rates were determined by subjective relief from epiphora and by endoscopic visualization of rhinostomy opening, granulation tissues/ synechiae at rhinostomy site and by result of sac syringing.  Results In Group A, complete relief was obtained in 75% patients, significant relief in 10% and no relief in 15% patients thus recording overall success rate of 85%; whereas in Group B complete relief of symptom was obtained in 70% patients, significant relief in 10% and no symptom relief in 20% patients thus recording the overall success rate of 80%. Cases in Group B were also found to have persistent epiphora (17.5%), stenosis of ostium (25%), granulation (35%) and synechia (37.5%).  Conclusion Stenting does not significantly improve the success of Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy but is associated with more complications.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karan Bhatia ◽  
Sabyasachi Sengupta ◽  
Madhu Bhadauria

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the success rate over time in patients undergoing External Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with acquired naso-lacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO), when done by a trainee ophthalmologist.Methods: The study was Prospective Observational study and was conducted in Tertiary Eye Hospital, Uttar Pradesh, India. One hundred and fourteen consecutive adult patients underwent external DCR for acquired complete NLDO by a trainee with less than 3 years of experience in ophthalmology between November 2011 and March 2013. Postoperative anatomic success rate was determined at 6 months on the basis of the patency of lacrimal sac syringing and patients were asked to subjectively evaluate improvement of their epiphora using a questionnaire.Results: Anatomical success rate across the entire study period was 93.7% and this improved from 87% in the first tertile of 38 patients to 94% in the second tertile and 100% in the final tertile of cases (p<0.05). Overall complication rate was 16.67% and reduced from 29% in the first tertile to 8% in the final tertile (p<0.05). Loss of anterior nasal flap was the commonest complication (10 cases) during the training period.Conclusion: External DCR, as a primary procedure for acquired NLDO, even when operated by trainee ophthalmologists, has a relatively high success rate that improves over time. As the learning curve improves, complication rates reduce significantly. Financial Disclosure: No author has any financial or proprietary interest in the material or method mentioned.


1970 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Shrestha ◽  
PK Kafle ◽  
S Pokhrel ◽  
M Maharjan ◽  
KC Toran

Background: Nasolacrimal duct obstruction is a common problem which can be corrected by dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). The gold standard treatment for this is DCR operation through an external approach. Development of endoscopic sinus surgery and endoscopic DCR performed through intranasal route is a major recent development in this field. Objectives: The aim of this study is to find out the success rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicon stent intubation within the period of six month following surgery. Materials and methods: A prospective study was done on 26 patients with obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct referred from eye out-patient department to ENT OPD during one year period from 2008 to 2009. All the cases had undergone endoscopic DCR operation which was regularly followed up for a period of six months. Postoperative patency of ostium was checked by sac syringing and endoscopic visualisation of ostium in the nasal cavity. The success of surgery was categorised as: complete cure, partial cure and no improvement depending upon symptomatic relief and clinical examination such as sac syringing and endoscopic examination following surgery. Result: In six months' follow-up, 22 (84.5%) out of 26 patients had achieved the complete cure and 4 patients (15.5%) continued to have persistent epiphora. Conclusion: Endoscopic DCR is a beneficial procedure for nasolacrimal duct obstruction with no external scar on face and less bleeding. The success rate is as good as external DCR. Key words: Nasolacrimal duct; Epiphora; Rigid nasal endoscope; Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v8i2.3557 Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2010), Vol. 8, No. 2, Issue 30, 195-198


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document