scholarly journals Successes rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy at KMC

1970 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Shrestha ◽  
PK Kafle ◽  
S Pokhrel ◽  
M Maharjan ◽  
KC Toran
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Symptomatic Relief ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Complete Cure ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Endoscopic Dcr ◽  
Sac Syringing

Background: Nasolacrimal duct obstruction is a common problem which can be corrected by dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). The gold standard treatment for this is DCR operation through an external approach. Development of endoscopic sinus surgery and endoscopic DCR performed through intranasal route is a major recent development in this field. Objectives: The aim of this study is to find out the success rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicon stent intubation within the period of six month following surgery. Materials and methods: A prospective study was done on 26 patients with obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct referred from eye out-patient department to ENT OPD during one year period from 2008 to 2009. All the cases had undergone endoscopic DCR operation which was regularly followed up for a period of six months. Postoperative patency of ostium was checked by sac syringing and endoscopic visualisation of ostium in the nasal cavity. The success of surgery was categorised as: complete cure, partial cure and no improvement depending upon symptomatic relief and clinical examination such as sac syringing and endoscopic examination following surgery. Result: In six months' follow-up, 22 (84.5%) out of 26 patients had achieved the complete cure and 4 patients (15.5%) continued to have persistent epiphora. Conclusion: Endoscopic DCR is a beneficial procedure for nasolacrimal duct obstruction with no external scar on face and less bleeding. The success rate is as good as external DCR. Key words: Nasolacrimal duct; Epiphora; Rigid nasal endoscope; Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v8i2.3557 Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2010), Vol. 8, No. 2, Issue 30, 195-198

scholarly journals Role of silicone stenting in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 248
Author(s):  
Abdussalam M. Jahan ◽  
Yousef M. Eldanfur ◽  
Abdulhakim B. Ghuzi
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
P Value ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Silicone Stent ◽  
Endoscopic Dcr

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a surgical procedure performed to relief nasolacrimal duct obstruction, which involves the creation of ostium at the lacrimal bone to form a shunt in the nasolacrimal pathway. Closure of the rhinostomy opening was considered a major factor for surgical failure. Use of silicone stent in endoscopic DCR to improve the success rate of the operation have been tried by many surgeons. In this study we assess the success rates of endoscopic DCR with and without silicone stents.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Prospective study includes 30 patients were operated in the Department of ENT, Misrata Medical Center, from April 2017 to March 2018. They underwent endonasal endoscopic DCR for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.<strong> </strong>These patients were randomly divided in two groups: A and B with 15 patients in each group. The group A patients underwent endoscopic DCR with silicone stent and group B patients underwent endoscopic DCR without stent. The results were statistically analyzed by chi-square test.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> 30 patients were included in this study, their age ranged from 17 to 60 years, complaining of epiphora, 24 (80%) were females and 6 (20%) were males. The success rate was higher in patients with silicone stent (93.33%) as compared to patients without silicone stent (86.67%) but this difference in the results is not statistically significant (As p value is 0.542 which is &gt;0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Endoscopic DCR is safe, successful procedure for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction and there was no significant difference in the success rates of performing endonasal DCR with silicone or without silicone stents.</p>

scholarly journals Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction: an assessment of post-operative outcomes at a tertiary health care centre

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. K. L. N. Raju Dantuluri
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Drainage System ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Deviated Nasal Septum ◽  
Health Care Centre ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Operative Outcomes

Background: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (Endo DCR) is a well-established surgical treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) cases. Advances in surgical technique and a better understanding of the anatomy have resulted in improvement of the success rate. The objective of this study is to assess the factors responsible for the recurrence of nasolacrimal system obstruction by evaluating the post-operative outcomes of Endo DCR at a tertiary health care centre.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in the department of ENT, GVP IHC and MT, Visakhapatnam – Andhra Pradesh on 52 patients who underwent Endo DCR procedure from September 2018 to September 2021. The data regarding lacrimal drainage system, operative details, surgical outcomes and complications were analysed.Results: Fifty-two patients (18 male and 34 female) underwent 63 Endo DCR surgeries for NLDO. Success was achieved in 50 cases (79.4%), and failure in 13 (20.6%). Of the 13 failed cases, anatomical obstruction at the fistula site was found in 6 (46.2% of failed cases), whereas functional failure with no evidence of obstruction was found in 7 (53.8%).Conclusions: The success rate appears to be influenced by preoperative parameters like clinical as well as radiological examination of eye and nose; ruling out intraoperative conditions like sinusitis, deviated nasal septum, polyps. These are essential for better coordinating therapeutic expectations and better patient selection. Endo DCR proved to be a safe invasive procedure as it has direct approach to the sac and produced excellent results without any external scar.

scholarly journals Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicon stent: our experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 785
Author(s):  
Neeraj Suri ◽  
Bhavya B. M.
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effective ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Endoscopic Dcr ◽  
Surgical Modality ◽  
External Dcr

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Dacryocystorhinostomy is the current surgical modality of treatment preferred for patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Both external and endonasal endoscopic approaches have been in practice with their own merits and demerits. Since the invention of endoscopes, endoscopic DCR is preferred for its scarless, minimally invasive technique and many modifications have been done over years like placement of silicon stents to reduce recurrence.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> In our study we evaluated 70 patients with epiphora with obstruction in nasolacrimal duct, Fresh cases and revision cases who had undergone either external and/ endoscopic DCR without stent were included. All patients underwent endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with silicon stent placement. Patients were followed postoperatively for a period of 6 months to 3 years.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The results were compared with that of external DCR and endoscopic DCR without stent. In our study we found that, endoscopic DCR with silicon stent had less chances of recurrence and synechiae formation. Results at 3 years follow up have been good with 95.7% patients relieved of symptoms completely.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Endoscopic DCR is a cost effective and a safe alternative for External DCR in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. We found that endoscopic DCR with stenting had several advantages over more conventional external approach.</p>

scholarly journals Bilateral Simultaneous Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: Outcome and Impact on the Quality of Life of the Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 191-195
Author(s):  
Islam R. Herzallah ◽  
Osama A. Marglani ◽  
Ameen Z. Alherabi ◽  
Nuha S. Faraj ◽  
Deemah H. Bukhari
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Symptom Score ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction Bilateral simultaneous endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endo-DCR) has received little attention in the literature, thus many surgeons continue to address bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction at two stages, rather than in the same setting. Objective To evaluate the feasibility and the outcome of simultaneous bilateral Endo-DCR and its impact on the quality of life of the patients. Methods We have conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous endo-DCR between March 2013 and February 2017 at our tertiary care institution. The reviewed data included clinical presentation; operative details; success rate; pre and postoperative evaluation of the symptoms of the patients, using the Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Symptom Score Questionnaire; satisfaction of the patients, and improvement in the quality of life, assessed by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaire. Results Out of 128 cases in which endo-DCRs were performed, 13 were bilateral (26 sides). Postoperative success was documented in 24 of the 26 sides (92.3%), with a mean follow-up duration of 16.2 months. The two failed sides were reported in the same case. The preoperative symptom score ranged between 12 and 80 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 38.23 ± 15.7). The postoperative symptom score was significantly lower (mean ± SD: 5.4 ± 12.9). The success rates in unilateral and bilateral cases were comparable, with no statistically significant difference. A notable improvement in the quality of life of the patients was also reported, with a mean GBI score of 81.38 ± 12.37. Conclusion Our results support that a simultaneous bilateral endo-DCR is a safe procedure that offers a high success rate, spares the patient from the stress of a second surgery, provides the patient with a bilateral resolution of the symptoms, and confers an immediate improvement in the quality of life of the patients.

scholarly journals Trans Canalicular Diode LASER DCR with ‘Bari Device’ in Pediatric Cases

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (Number 2) ◽  
pp. 8-10
Author(s):  
Md. B B Bhuiyan ◽  
A Akber ◽  
M S Islam ◽  
K U Chowdhury ◽  
M Choudhury
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Middle Turbinate ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dcr ◽  
External Dcr

Epiphora due to Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is common in chidren. About 5% to 20% infants show evidence of congenital Nasolacrimal duct obstruction with symptoms 1,2. Most of them (95%) cured by conservative management. Majority of the remaining symptomatic patients are cured by probing, repeat probing, probing with incubation and Baloonplasty procedures. About 4% of the patients need surgical intervention. Conventional Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the main treatment of choice in these cases till to date. DCR means creation of an alternate pathway between lacrimal sac and nasal cavity to drain tear when nasolacrimal duct (NLD) is blocked. There are different surgical techniques available for DCR. These includes conventional or external DCR, endoscopic DCR, endoscopic Laser DCR, transcanalicular or endocanalicular Laser DCR. In adult DCR can be carried out comfortably by the conventional or newly developed endoscopic approach. Narrow space, inadequate development of anatomical landmark makes both the conventional & endoscopic DCR difficult in children. Long term success rate of External DCR in pediatric patients is less in comparison to adult due to vigorous growth of tissue in a child. Laser DCR has been tried but long term success rate is not up to the mark. Several observations like- primary osteum closure, cicatrix formation with middle turbinate and nasal septum, granulation tissue formation- all are more in children due to marked fibroblastic response. So Laser DCR is a challenge in pediatric patients.

Mitomycin C in Revision Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Prospective Randomized Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 425-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina Penttilä ◽  
Grigori Smirnov ◽  
Juha Seppa ◽  
Kai Kaarniranta ◽  
Henri Tuomilehto
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy

Background Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is an effective and safe procedure when treating saccal and postsaccal nasolacrimal duct obstruction. However, sometimes scarring of the rhinostomy site caused by fibrosis may occur, particularly in revision operations. The application of intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC), an antiproliferative agent, has been introduced as one possible technique to improve the outcome. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate if the use of MMC improves the success in endonasal revision DCR procedure. Methods Thirty revision EN-DCR procedures were performed during 2004–2010. The patients were randomized into two study groups, according to whether the intraoperative MMC was used or not. The technique of EN-DCR procedure in both groups was the same, but in the MMC group, at the end of the procedure a piece of tampon soaked in MMC (0.4 mg/mL) was placed into the rhinostoma for 5 minutes. No silicone stents were inserted. The surgical outcome at the 6-month follow-up visit was considered successful if the lacrimal sac irrigation succeeded and if the patients’ symptoms were relieved. Results The success rate after revision EN-DCR with MMC was 93% and without MMC was 60%. The overall success rate was 77%. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). The relief of the symptoms between groups in both the Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Symptom Score and ocular symptoms was statistically significant (p = 0.007 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusion The results of our study indicate that the application of intraoperative mitomycin C may improve the outcome in revision EN-DCR.

scholarly journals Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in Misrata central hospital, Libya

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 317
Author(s):  
Abdussalam M. Jahan ◽  
Yousef M. Eldanfur ◽  
Abdulhakim Ben Ghuzi
Keyword(s):  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Endoscopic Dcr ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Right

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a surgical procedure performed for the relief of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). This procedure involves the creation of ostium at the lacrimal bone to form a shunt in the nasolacrimal pathway. It can be performed externally or endoscopically.<strong> </strong>The aim of this study is to<strong> </strong>evaluate the success rates and complications of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy<strong> </strong>in Misurata Central Hospital. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Prospective study includes 30 patients admitted to the ENT-Department, Misrata Central Hospital over a period of one year, starting from April 2016 to March 2017. They underwent endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.  </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Thirty patients were included in the study. Their age ranged from 11-60 years, with mean age of 33 years. Most of the patients were in the age range of 31 to 50 years. There were 24 (80%) females and 6 (20%) males. The most common complaint of patients before surgery was epiphora. There was more obstruction on left side -21 (70%) than on the right side-9 (30%). Bilateral involvement was not seen. Three patients (10%) were required septoplasty during the endoscopic DCR procedure. Twenty four out of thirty (80%) patients had complete resolution. There were no any significant major complications observed in any patient in our study. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Endoscopic DCR is safe, successful procedure for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction and has several advantages over conventional external approach.</span></p>

scholarly journals Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flap : Our experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Nagendran Navaneethan
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Nasal Endoscopy ◽  
Subjective Improvement ◽  
Mucosal Flap ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Diagnostic Endoscopy

Background: The purpose of our study was to evaluate outcome of Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without preservation of mucosal flap for the management of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction Methods: A retrospective review of 26 patients were performed on patients who underwent Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without preservation of mucosal flap from March 2007 to November 2010 at our hospital. Twenty six patients were operated and followed up postoperatively for five to six weeks with lacrimal syringing by ophthalmologists and diagnostic endoscopy done at third month and followed up until the formation of well formed ostium and patients became asymptomatic. Main outcome were subjective improvement in epiphora and persistence of anatomic patency of ostium. Result: There were 26 patients operated, one is male and all others were female. The age of patients were ranging within 20 to 78 years (mean 36.65years).Every patients were followed up in the range of four months to two years (mean 6.2 months). Septoplasty was required in only one patient prior to DCR. Anatomic patency were confirmed by nasal endoscopy in twenty four patients (92%), remaining two had synechiae without ostium. One patient among 24 patients had ostium and lacrimal flow with intermittent epiphora. Our overall success rate with anatomical patency and without symptoms of epiphora is 88%. Conclusion: Our results with endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy are comparable with previously published outcomes. Our data suggest that endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without preservation of mucosal flap may be performed DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v19i1.11728 Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 19(1): 41-45

scholarly journals External dacryocystorhinostomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-185
Author(s):  
Li Ying Long ◽  
Safinaz Mohd Khialdin ◽  
Nazila Binti Ahmad Azli
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Posterior Flap ◽  
External Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
External Dcr

Aim: To analyse the epidemiological data, surgical technique, success rate, and complications of patients who underwent external DCR in Hospital Selayang from January 2015 to December 2016. Method: Retrospective case series. Results: A total of 21 eyes of 20 patients who underwent external DCR from January 2015 to December 2016 were identified and reviewed. There were 15 females (75%) and 5 males (25%). Age ranged from 5 to 75 years old, with a median age of 56 years old (IQR 23). Twelve patients presented with epiphora while eight patients presented with symptoms of dacryocystitis. One case was congenital, two were secondary nasolacrimal duct obstruction and the rest were primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. All patients underwent external DCR under general anaesthesia. Silicone tube were inserted in 21 eyes, of which all were removed 3 months after the surgery except one patient whom had his tube dislodged accidentally. The overall success rate was 90.5% (n = 19), which was defined as no or minimal intermittent epiphora or no reflux on lacrimal irrigation at 12 months postoperative. There was one patient who had a cerebrospinal fluid leak treated successfully with intravenous antibiotics. Conclusion: The surgical success rate for external dacryocystorhinostomy was comparable to that of the global success rate of external DCR. This is attributed to the application of surgical technique such as anterior suspended flap modification and posterior flap excision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document