Giant urethral stone with diverticulum; a case report

Urethral calculi are rare and represent 1-2% of all urinary stone diseases. Rarely, calculus grows to large size and are labeled as a "giant urethral calculus". A 75-year-old male came to the OPD of Madinah Teaching Hospital Faisalabad with a chief complaint of suprapubic pain, penile pain, and hard mass on the left side of the scrotum and anterior perineum. The patient had a significant history of undergoing debridement for Meleney's and Fournier's gangrene, along with suprapubic cystostomy done about 1.5 years back. Physical examination revealed a solid mass with dimensions 6x7 cm on the left side of the scrotum and anterior perineum (left periurethral area). Open surgery was performed. A huge stone, 6x6cm, was removed. Diverticulae were excised, and urethroplasty was performed. A catheter was removed on the 21st postoperative with a satisfactory urinary stream.

An impacted urethral stone: a rare cause of acute urinary retention in women—case report

Background Urethral calculi are rare, representing 1–2% of all calculi affecting the urinary tract. Impacted urethra calculi are commoner in males due to anatomical differences between the male and female urethra. The treatment approach is determined by the size and location of the stone, associated anomalies and available facilities. Case presentation We present the case of 35-year-old woman who presented with acute urinary retention secondary to an impacted urethral stone. The calculus could not be removed through the external urethral meatus due to the size of the stone. She had cystolithotomy after retrograde manipulation to the bladder. She did well postoperatively. This line of management was based on the size of the stone, and the available facilities which are typical of many hospitals in developing countries. Conclusions Urethral calculi are extremely rare in women. The treatment should be individualized.

The one-stage balloon dilatation with stone extraction for a combination of short urethral stricture and urethral stone in men

Introduction. The literature highlights isolated studies examining approaches to the treatment of patients with a combination of stones and urethral stricture. In this regard, the problem of creating optimal tactics for managing such patients remains relevant.Purpose of the study. To analyze of own experience in treating patients with a combination of stricture and urethral stone using balloon dilation with urethral stone extraction.Materials and methods. The study included 7 men with short urethral stricture and stone, who underwent balloon dilation with urethral stone extraction. The age of patients ranged from 47 to 65 years (median - 52 years). The length of the urethral stricture ranged from 3 to 10 mm (median - 7 mm). The stricture in 2 (28.6%) cases was localized in the penile part of the urethra and 5 (71.4%) in the bulbous part. An etiology of urethral strictures: traumatic - in 2 (42.9%) patients, inflammatory - in 1 (14.3%) of cases, idiopathic - in 4 (57.1%) of cases. All patients had 1 urethral stone. The sizes of the stone ranged from 4 to 9 mm (median - 6 mm).Results. The operation time ranged from 11 to 19 min (median - 13 min). No patient had any intraoperative complications. UTIs was observed in the early postoperative period in 1 patient. The duration of postoperative hospital stay ranged from 1 to 5 days (median - 3 days). Postoperative follow-up ranged from 3 to 24 months (median - 14 months). Only 1 (14.3%) patient had a recurrence of urethral stricture 18 months after treatment. Thus, the overall treatment success in this group of patients was 85.7% (6/7).Conclusion. We used this conjunction approach when combined stricture and urethral stone in men for the first time in the world. It seems quite promising given the results.

Impacted urethral stone presenting as urinary retention in a child

A seven-year-old boy was referred to our Accident and Emergency department with a history of urinary retention secondary to urinary tract infection and an inability to pass a urethral catheter. He had been treated a month before for suspected pyelonephritis by the referring hospital. Attempts at urethral catheterisation failed, and he was taken to theatre for cystourethroscopy and catheter placement. At this time, an impacted urethral stone was discovered. Because it could not be dislodged, a suprapubic catheter was placed, and the child was brought back at a later date for definitive management. Investigations revealed a pure calcium oxalate stone that was secondary in origin. There has been no recurrence during a follow-up period of 6 months.This illustrates that while rare, urethral stones do occur in children and should be considered in children presenting with urinary retention, haematuria and/or abdominal pain.

Scrotal calculi with delayed urethroscrotal fistula: a rare case presentation with literature review

Scrotal calculi are not so common entity in the clinical presentation. Scrotourethral fistula is an abnormal communication between scrotal skin and the urethra, usually result of the inflammation and due to perforation by urethral calculi and sometimes iatrogenic due to surgery done for urethral stone removal or uretheroplasty. We present here a very rare case of young adult gentleman who initially presented with a scrotal swelling, turned out into scrotal calculi while doing surgical excision, later on presented as uretheroscrotal fistula that managed conservatively. After going through the available literature and through the pub med articles (approx 148 articles while searching with titles of ‘scrotal calculi’, ‘scrotourethral fistula’, ‘uretherocutaneous fistula’) we found only 1-2 cases of scrotourethral fistula. A high index of clinical suspicion and examination is needed to diagnose such asymptomatic rare presentation cases.