helical scan
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

371
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 4198-4208
Author(s):  
Haoran Jin ◽  
Zesheng Zheng ◽  
Siyu Liu ◽  
Yuanjin Zheng
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 557-566
Author(s):  
Ichiro Fujimura ◽  
Katsuhiro Ichikawa ◽  
Yohei Miura ◽  
Takashi Hoshino ◽  
Shoichi Terakawa

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
Ramaa Lingaiah ◽  
Md Abbas Ali ◽  
Ummay Kulsum ◽  
Muhtasim Aziz Muneem ◽  
Karthick Raj Mani ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim: To estimate the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) using different modes (axial, helical, slow, KV-CBCT & 4D-CT) of computed tomography (CT) in pulmonary tumors. Materials & Methods: We have retrospectively included ten previously treated case of carcinoma of primary lung or metastatic lung using Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in this study. All the patients underwent 4 modes of CT scan Axial, Helical, Slow & 4D-CT using GE discovery 16 Slice PET-CT scanner and daily KV-CBCT for the daily treatment verification. For standardization, all the patients underwent different modes of scan using 2.5 mm slice thickness, 16 detectors rows and field of view of 400mm. Slow CT was performed using axial mode scan by increasing the CT tube rotation time (typically 3 – 4 sec.) as per the breathing period of the patients. 4D-CT scans were performed and the entire respiratory cycle was divided into ten phases. Maximum Intensity Projections (MIP), Minimum Intensity Projections (MinIP) and Average Intensity Projections (AvIP) were derived from the 10 phases. GTV volumes were delineated for all the patients in all the scanning modes (GTVAX - Axial, GTVHL - Helical, GTVSL – Slow, GTVMIP -4DCT and GTVCB – KV-CBCT) in the Eclipse treatment planning system version 11.0 (M/S Varian Medical System, USA). GTV volumes were measured, documented and compared with the different modes of CT scans. Results: The mean ± standard deviation (range) for MIP, slow, axial, helical & CBCT were 36.5 ± 40.5 (2.29 – 87.0), 35.38 ± 39.52 (2.1 – 82), 31.95 ± 37.29 (1.32 – 66.9), 28.98 ± 33.36 (1.01 – 65.9) & 37.16 ± 42.23 (2.29 – 92). Overall underestimation of helical scan and axial scan compared to MIP is 21% and 12.5%. CBCT and slow CT volume has a good correlation with the MIP volume. Conclusion: For SBRT in lung tumors better to avoid axial and helical scan for target delineation. MIP is a still a golden standard for the ITV delineation, but in the absence of 4DCT scanner, Slow CT and KV-CBCT data may be considered for ITV delineation with caution.


2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 1141-1149
Author(s):  
Takahito Mizusaki ◽  
Shunsuke Imai ◽  
Ryo Kajiura ◽  
Yuki Nakashima ◽  
Takeshi Kondo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (11) ◽  
pp. 1800-1811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Pankhurst ◽  
Nghia T. Vo ◽  
Alan R. Butcher ◽  
Haili Long ◽  
Hongchang Wang ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 791-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Rosendahl ◽  
Ludwig Büermann

AbstractWith improvements in CT technology, the need for reliable patient-specific dosimetry increased in the recent years. The accuracy of Monte-Carlo simulations for absolute dose estimation is related to scanner specific information on the X-ray spectra of the scanner as well as the form filter geometries and compositions. In this work a mobile measurement setup is developed, which allows both to determine the X-ray spectra and equivalent form filter of a specific scanner from just one helical scan in less than 2 minutes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document