biomarker quantitation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

25
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 412 (8) ◽  
pp. 1879-1892
Author(s):  
Stephan Klatt ◽  
Anne Roberts ◽  
Amber Lothian ◽  
Colin L. Masters ◽  
Roberto Cappai ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 474 ◽  
pp. 112671
Author(s):  
Srinidi Mohan ◽  
Robert Lawton ◽  
Chase Palmer ◽  
Augusto Cadenas Rojas

Inventions ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Aditya R. Jangid ◽  
E. Brandon Strong ◽  
Emiliano Escamilla ◽  
Brittany A. Lore ◽  
Nicholas J. Tod ◽  
...  

The following article summarizes United States Patent Application No. US20180052155A1, titled ‘Assay Devices and Methods’ (filed 16 August 2016, published 22 February 2018). While lateral flow assays (LFAs) have revolutionized point-of-care diagnostics by enabling accurate, inexpensive, and rapid detection of biomarkers, they typically do not provide quantitative results. Hence, there is a significant need for quantitative assays at the point of care. This patent summary describes a novel method of chronometric biomarker quantitation via enzymatic degradation of a metastable gelatin-based biomatrix, principally suited for use in paper-based microfluidic devices (microPADs). This new quantitation mechanism was designed to meet the ASSURED criteria for point-of-care diagnostic devices laid forth by the World Health Organization and may ultimately provide increased access to healthcare, at a significantly reduced cost, around the world.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P. Humphries ◽  
Sean Hynes ◽  
Victoria Bingham ◽  
Delphine Cougot ◽  
Jacqueline James ◽  
...  

The role of PD-L1 as a prognostic and predictive biomarker is an area of great interest. However, there is a lack of consensus on how to deliver PD-L1 as a clinical biomarker. At the heart of this conundrum is the subjective scoring of PD-L1 IHC in most studies to date. Current standard scoring systems involve separation of epithelial and inflammatory cells and find clinical significance in different percentages of expression, e.g., above or below 1%. Clearly, an objective, reproducible and accurate approach to PD-L1 scoring would bring a degree of necessary consistency to this landscape. Using a systematic comparison of technologies and the application of QuPath, a digital pathology platform, we show that high PD-L1 expression is associated with improved clinical outcome in Triple Negative breast cancer in the context of standard of care (SoC) chemotherapy, consistent with previous findings. In addition, we demonstrate for the first time that high PD-L1 expression is also associated with better outcome in ER- disease as a whole including HER2+ breast cancer. We demonstrate the influence of antibody choice on quantification and clinical impact with the Ventana antibody (SP142) providing the most robust assay in our hands. Through sampling different regions of the tumour, we show that tumour rich regions display the greatest range of PD-L1 expression and this has the most clinical significance compared to stroma and lymphoid rich areas. Furthermore, we observe that both inflammatory and epithelial PD-L1 expression are associated with improved survival in the context of chemotherapy. Moreover, as seen with PD-L1 inhibitor studies, a low threshold of PD-L1 expression stratifies patient outcome. This emphasises the importance of using digital pathology and precise biomarker quantitation to achieve accurate and reproducible scores that can discriminate low PD-L1 expression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document