python package
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

807
(FIVE YEARS 607)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 12)

Author(s):  
Christopher L. Hanselman ◽  
Xiangyu Yin ◽  
David C. Miller ◽  
Chrysanthos E. Gounaris

2022 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Knapen ◽  
Jonathan Kozaczuk ◽  
Tongyan Lin

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (69) ◽  
pp. 3895
Author(s):  
James Duncan ◽  
Rush Kapoor ◽  
Abhineet Agarwal ◽  
Chandan Singh ◽  
Bin Yu
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ofir Yakobi ◽  
Yefim Roth

The last decade was characterized by an emphasis on enhancing reproducibility and replicability in the social sciences. To contribute to these efforts within the decision-making research field, we introduce DEBM (Decision from Experience Behavior Modeling) – an open-source Python package. The main goal of DEBM is to serve as a central colloberative pool of models and methods in the decision from experience domain. Specifically, it provides a convenient “playground” for developing models or experimenting with existing ones. DEBM includes many features such as multiprocessing, parameter estimation, visualization, and more. In this paper we cover the basic functionality of DEBM by simulating behavior using an existing model and given parameters, and recovering these parameters using grid search.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Pirot ◽  
Ranee Joshi ◽  
Jérémie Giraud ◽  
Mark Douglas Lindsay ◽  
Mark Walter Jessell

Abstract. To support the needs of practitioners regarding 3D geological modelling and uncertainty quantification in the field, in particular from the mining industry, we propose a Python package called loopUI-0.1 that provides a set of local and global indicators to measure uncertainty and features dissimilarities among an ensemble of voxet models. Results are presented of a survey launched among practitioners in the mineral industry, enquiring about their modelling and uncertainty quantification practice and needs. It reveals that practitioners acknowledge the importance of uncertainty quantification even if they do not perform it. Four main factors preventing practitioners to perform uncertainty quantification were identified: lack of data uncertainty quantification, (computing) time requirement to generate one model, poor tracking of assumptions and interpretations, relative complexity of uncertainty quantification. The paper reviews and proposes solutions to alleviate these issues. Elements of an answer to these problems are already provided in the special issue hosting this paper and more are expected to come.


2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (69) ◽  
pp. 3981
Author(s):  
Pascal Merz ◽  
Wei-Tse Hsu ◽  
Matt Thompson ◽  
Simon Boothroyd ◽  
Chris Walker ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document