patient safety improvement
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

67
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 7512510267p1-7512510267p1
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Rhodus ◽  
Elizabeth Lancaster ◽  
Mary Duke ◽  
Andrew Harris

Abstract Date Presented Accepted for AOTA INSPIRE 2021 but unable to be presented due to online event limitations. The presented research offers an introduction to the use of root-cause analyses in the Veterans Health Administration for identification of falls in veterans with dementia who were referred to or receiving OT. Results identify specific areas for improvement that may be immediately implemented by OTin all health care systems. Such improvements to care may drastically improve patient safety and decrease fall risk in older adults with dementia. Primary Author and Speaker: Elizabeth Rhodus Contributing Authors: Elizabeth Lancaster, Mary Duke, and Andrew Harris


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1858-1865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle H. Sheetz ◽  
Justin B. Dimick ◽  
Michael J. Englesbe ◽  
Andrew M. Ryan

Author(s):  
Victoria Kennel ◽  
Julie Fedderson ◽  
Nicole Skinner ◽  
Bethany Lowndes

Patient safety improvement efforts across the country intend to address the threat of medical errors that lead to patient morbidity and mortality. Many hospital-based patient safety programs focus on team tools and skills to support the interdisciplinary nature of healthcare delivery. This institution utilizes two patient safety programs with different groups of professionals and medical trainees. The aim of our research was to identify tool and skill compatibility between the two programs for future integration into interprofessional clinical simulation-based training experiences. Two researchers conducted an independent content analysis of the tools and skills in the two programs to: 1) identify the similarities and differences among tools and skills, and, 2) categorize their potential for integration into clinical simulation-based training. The two programs had six common tools, a majority of which were communication-based. Over half the tools were team-focused. Five common team tools (Brief, SBAR, Check-Back, CUS, and Debrief) were identified for integration in interprofessional clinical simulation-based training experiences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document