calculation grid
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

45
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
pp. 47-54
Author(s):  
И.А. Болодьян ◽  
С.В. Пузач ◽  
А.С. Барановский

Рассматривается вопрос выбора расчетной сетки при моделировании пожара в тоннеле с помощью полевого метода и проводится оценка возможного влияния размеров ячеек сетки, а также граничного условия постоянства давления на результаты расчета. Выполнено моделирование пожара для четырех размеров расчетной сетки. Обоснована возможность применения наиболее грубой из используемых сеток с точки зрения инженерных расчетов, в том числе с оговоркой относительно постановки граничного условия. The issue of fire safety of road tunnels is currently an urgent task. Road tunnels are usually not standard typical facilities, but the unique structures. Therefore, it is necessary to study the influence of various parameters on the development of fire in order to take into account the characteristics of a particular object and make decisions on its effective fire protection. Implementation of field tests in this case is expensive and time-consuming. In this regard, numerical modeling is one of the most effective methods of such research. Field models are the most common and currently used for numerical calculations. These models are based on the numerical solution of the system of conservation equations for small control volumes of the calculation grid. This paper examines the issues of selection the calculation grid when modeling a fire in tunnels using the field method is considered and the possible influence of the size of the grid cells is estimated. The mathematical model used in this work is based on a set of differential equations of hydrodynamics, heat transfer, as well as the equation of conservation of the masses of components. Four computational grids were selected for a horizontal (without slope) model tunnel to determine the optimal cell size. As a result of conducted calculations it was established the following: the size of calculated grid is not fundamental for the initial stage of the fire; the use of smaller grid may be preferable at further development of fire, accompanied by increase of combustion capacity to the maximum; the maximum temperature values, especially in the far sections, are obtained on the coarsest grid. The use of such a grid for estimated engineering calculations can be allowed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-272
Author(s):  
Dong-Jin Kang ◽  
◽  
Jae-Yong Jung ◽  
Young-Joo Shin ◽  
Jung-Whan Min ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Bai ◽  
Sijin Zhu ◽  
Xingrao Wu ◽  
Xuhong Liu ◽  
Feihu Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To explore the efficacy and sensitivity of 3D gamma analysis and bio-mathematical model for cervical cancer in detecting dose changes caused by dose-calculation-grid-size (DCGS).Methods:17 patients’ plans for cervical cancer were enrolled (Pinnacle TPS,VMAT), and the DCGS was changed from 2.0mm to 5.0mm to calculate the planned dose respectively. The dose distribution calculated by DCGS = 2.0mm as the “reference” data set (RDS), the dose distribution calculated by the rest DCGS as the“measurement”data set (MDS), the 3D gamma passing rates and the (N)TCPs of the all structures under different DCGS were obtained, and then analyze the ability of 3D gamma analysis and (N)TCP model in detecting dose changes and what factors affect this ability.Results: The effect of DCGS on planned dose was obvious. When the gamma standard was 1.0mm, 1.0% and 10.0%, the difference of the results of the DCGS on dose-effect could be detected by 3D gamma analysis (all p value < 0.05). With the decline of the standard, 3D gamma analysis’ ability to detect this difference shows weaker. When the standard was 1.0mm, 3.0% and 10.0%, the p value of > 0.05 accounted for the majority. With DCGS=2.0mm being RDS, ∆gamma-passing-rate presented the same trend with ∆(N)TCPs of all structures except for the femurs only when the 1.0mm, 1.0% and 10.0% standards were adopted for the 3D gamma analysis.Conclusions: The 3D gamma analysis and bio-mathematical model can be used to analyze the effect of DCGS on the planned dose. For comparison, the former’s detection ability has a lot to do with the designed standard, and the latter’s capability is related to the parameters and calculated accuracy instrinsically.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Bai ◽  
Sijin Zhu ◽  
Xingrao Wu ◽  
Xuhong Liu ◽  
Feihu Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective : To explore the efficacy and sensitivity of 3DVH-γanalysis and bio-mathematical model for cervical cancer in detecting dose changes caused by dose-calculation-grid-size(DCGS). Methods: 17 patients’ plans for cervical cancer were enrolled(Pinnacle TPS,VMAT), and the DCGS was changed from 2.0mm to 5.0mm to calculate the planned dose respectively. The dose distribution calculated by DCGS = 2.0mm as the “ reference ” data set (RDS) , the dose distribution calculated by the rest DCGS as the“measurement”data set (MDS), the 3DVH-γ passing rates and the (N)TCPs of the all structures under different DCGS were obtained , and then analyze the ability of 3DVH-γ analysis and (N)TCP model in detecting dose changes and what factors affect this ability. Results: The effect of DCGS on planned dose was obvious. When the γ-standard was 1.0mm, 1.0% and 10.0%, the difference of the results of the DCGS on dose-effect could be detected by 3DVH-γ analysis ( p s<0.05). With the decline of the standard, 3DVH-γ analysis’ ability to detect this difference shows weaker. When the standard was 1.0mm, 3.0% and 10.0%, the p value of >0.05 accounted for the majority. With DCGS=2.0mm being RDS, ∆γ-passing-rate presented the same trend with ∆(N)TCPs of all structures except for the femurs only when the 1.0mm, 1.0% and 10.0% standards were adopted for the 3DVH-γ analysis. Conclusions: The 3DVH-γ analysis and bio-mathematical model can be used to analyze the effect of DCGS on the planned dose. For comparison, the former’s detection ability has a lot to do with the designed standard, and the latter’s capability is related to the parameters and calculated accuracy instrinsically.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-333
Author(s):  
Hidetoshi Shimizu ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Hiroshi Tanaka ◽  
Takahiro Aoyama ◽  
Hiroyuki Tachibana ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document