mining commission
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

0
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward “Ted” Holt ◽  
George Hayek ◽  
Brandt Hill

This case reviewed and conclusively determined the proper venue in which to file appeals from decisions by the Alabama Surface Mining Commission (the “Commission”). The Commission issued a surface-coal-mining permit to Black Warrior Minerals, Inc. (“Black Warrior”), allowing Black Warrior to mine land in northern Jefferson County, Alabama. In response, three. individuals who owned property nearby appealed the permit’s issuance with the Commission’s Department of Hearings and Appeals, and a hearing officer affirmed the issuance. The property owners then petitioned the Commission for review of the officer’s decision, but their petition was never taken up and thus was denied by operation of law.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-45
Author(s):  
Evgeny G. Neklyudov

Introduction. Mining supervision is an important part of the supervisory function of the state. It is designed to protect the country’s mineral resources of national importance from plundering or predatory development, and workers from dangerous working conditions, but at the same time should not hinder rational business activities. An important milestone in the development of mining supervision in Russia was the 1860s, when major transformations began in the country, affecting the organizational basis of the mining industry. In historiography the preparation of mining reform has not been subjected to special research. In this situation, the purpose of the article becomes the analysis of the proposed in the 1860s projects of reforming mining supervision in Russia and determining their importance for the development of supervision in the second half of the XIX – early XX centuries. Materials and Methods. The study is based on legislative acts, record keeping documentation of the Commission for the Revision of the Mining Regulations and the Commission for revising the system of taxes and fees, as well as reference publications of the Mining Department and materials of the sectoral periodicals. Historical genetic and comparative methods of scientific analysis are used. Results and Discussion. During the preparation of mining reform in the 1860s two alternatives were proposed for the organization of mining supervision in the Russian Empire. One of them suggested the creation of an institute of district engineers who were part of a specialized mining management system, while the other, together with this system, also abolished mining supervision, transferring its functions to other institutions. In practice the first version of the reform, proposed by the Mining Commission, was implemented. At the initial stage of the formation of the new mining supervision since 1865, it was combined with the pre-reform institutions represented by factory guardians. At the second stage, from 1886, the institute of district engineers completely replaced the former forms of supervision and covered the entire territory of the Russian Empire, which was divided into 11 mining regions. Conclusion. In the second half of the XIX – early XX century а new system of mining administration was created, covering the entire territory of the Russian Empire. The most important function of this department was the supervision of private enterprises, which was organized in accordance with the project, developed during the preparation of the Great Reforms of the reign of Alexander II.


2015 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
William D. Birch ◽  
Thomas A. Darragh

George Henry Frederick Ulrich (1830–1900) was educated at the Clausthal Mining School in Germany and arrived in Victoria in 1853. After a short period on the goldfields, he was employed on the Mining Commission and then on the Geological Survey of Victoria until its closure in 1868. In 1870 he was appointed Curator and Lecturer at the newly established Industrial and Technological Museum of Victoria. In 1878 he was appointed inaugural Director of the Otago School of Mines, New Zealand, a position he held until his death in 1900. His legacy includes detailed original maps of central Victorian goldfields, the foundation of the state’s geological collections, and among the first accounts of Victorian geology published in German periodicals, until now little known. As the only scientist of his times in Victoria with the qualifications and expertise to accurately identify and properly describe minerals, he provided the first comprehensive accounts of Victorian mineralogy, including the identification of the first new mineral in Australia, which he named maldonite. His contribution to mineralogy is recognised by the species ulrichite. Ulrich was universally respected for his scientific achievements and highly regarded for his personal qualities.


Refractories ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 20 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 402-404
Author(s):  
G. P. Kobel'kov ◽  
S. S. Lebedkin ◽  
N. G. Volchenko
Keyword(s):  

Refractories ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 14 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 404-408
Author(s):  
A. N. Turenko ◽  
V. L. Yazev ◽  
R. T. Berezanskii ◽  
L. I. Chernoplechii ◽  
V. S. Polishchuk

Refractories ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 12 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 162-162
Author(s):  
A. V. Anikeev ◽  
A. P. Pomorgailo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document