recalcitrant material
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

4
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 448-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Gómez-Vidal ◽  
Manuel Tena ◽  
Luis Vicente Lopez-Llorca ◽  
Jesús Salinas

1982 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley A. Barlow

The Heracles as Euripides' other middle plays has not escaped censure for its faulty structure. From Swinburne's judgement of it as a ‘grotesque abortion’ one comes to Norwood who says of Gilbert Murray's view ‘A great Hellenist who is the last man to hunt for blemishes in Euripides has rightly called Heracles “broken-backed”’, and he adds himself that the play ‘at best must be called ramshackle work’ or ‘The action falls into 2 halves visibly separate though tied together. In each instance a champion of the poet if ingenious and resolute enough can devise some statement that will force unity of action upon his recalcitrant material, but the mere fact that he must so labour refutes him’.


PMLA ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheridan Baker

The female husband (published 12 November 1746) is an anonymous pamphlet so obscure and so nearly pornographic that its few acquaintances have passed it by, almost in complete silence. I know of only four copies, one each in the British Museum, the Bristol Public Libraries, the Huntington Library, and the library of Charles B. Woods, of the State University of Iowa. It purports to be the biography of one Mary Hamilton, who was in fact tried for fraud at Taunton, Somerset, on 7 October 1746. It has long been acknowledged, on external evidence, as Henry Fielding's. But among themselves scholars remain skeptical. The pamphlet has remained in limbo, listed for immortality but ignored, not quite accepted and not quite damned. I hope to demonstrate beyond all doubt that The Female Husband is Fielding's, and to suggest that this pamphlet, though of slight literary worth, is an interesting exhibit of Fielding at work upon meager journalistic fact, a somewhat discomforting glimpse of the comic moralist trying to sustain his principles and his comedy within recalcitrant material.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document