Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

239
(FIVE YEARS 74)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Published By Springer-Verlag

2196-2979

Author(s):  
Ellen F. Finch ◽  
Lois W. Choi-Kain ◽  
Evan A. Iliakis ◽  
Jane L. Eisen ◽  
Anthony Pinto

Author(s):  
J. S. A. Lee ◽  
S. Bestmann ◽  
C. Evans

Abstract Purpose of Review Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is used to non-invasively modulate brain activity in health and disease. Current flow modeling (CFM) provides estimates of where and how much electrical current is delivered to in the brain during tES. It therefore holds promise as a method to reduce commonplace variability in tES delivery and, in turn, the outcomes of stimulation. However, the adoption of CFM has not yet been widespread and its impact on tES outcome variability is unclear. Here, we discuss the potential barriers to effective, practical CFM-informed tES use. Recent Findings CFM has progressed from models based on concentric spheres to gyri-precise head models derived from individual MRI scans. Users can now estimate the intensity of electrical fields (E-fields), their spatial extent, and the direction of current flow in a target brain region during tES. Here. we consider the multi-dimensional challenge of implementing CFM to optimise stimulation dose: this requires informed decisions to prioritise E-field characteristics most likely to result in desired stimulation outcomes, though the physiological consequences of the modelled current flow are often unknown. Second, we address the issue of a disconnect between predictions of E-field characteristics provided by CFMs and predictions of the physiological consequences of stimulation which CFMs are not designed to address. Third, we discuss how ongoing development of CFM in conjunction with other modelling approaches could overcome these challenges while maintaining accessibility for widespread use. Summary The increasing complexity and sophistication of CFM is a mandatory step towards dose control and precise, individualised delivery of tES. However, it also risks counteracting the appeal of tES as a straightforward, cost-effective tool for neuromodulation, particularly in clinical settings.


Author(s):  
Jarrod M. Ellingson ◽  
Jesse D. Hinckley ◽  
J. Megan Ross ◽  
Joseph P. Schacht ◽  
L. Cinnamon Bidwell ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Erica M. Schulte ◽  
Ariana M. Chao ◽  
Kelly C. Allison
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Sarvodaya Tripathy ◽  
Nitika Singh ◽  
Amit Singh ◽  
Sujita Kumar Kar
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document